My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN020712
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
CCMIN020712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 4:48:57 PM
Creation date
3/23/2012 4:48:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Hosterman asked for rebuttal from the Appellant and Applicant. <br /> David Cunningham, applicant, referred to the story poles and said they are designed to describe height <br /> and they are ugly. They were up for so long they were sagging. They made two major changes since <br /> they went up and never changed the story poles. He is surprised with Linda Garbarino's comments, as <br /> she called it a lovely home and all they did was take off the study and now it is a shed. Regarding 215 <br /> Neal being neglected, Ms. Garbarino has no idea of the amount of money he has put into the inside of <br /> that house. He will never do anything to the exterior except for paint. He takes this as a direct insult. <br /> Fran Cunningham, applicant, felt things are very misconstrued. They have done everything they can <br /> and it is opinion and not fact and not right, and she hoped the Council will take the facts into <br /> consideration. <br /> Brian Bourg, appellant, read a letter of opposition into the record from Dustin Boyes, neighbor at 4512 <br /> Second Street, who was at a Boy Scout meeting, regarding 4 points—massing is too big; too many <br /> variances; south elevation lacks a decent design; all elevations should have a similar design and if they <br /> do not, it puts too much on too little of an area; and voiced non-support. Mr. Bourg said he did not think <br /> when Mr. Donahue did the addition had to get a variance when there were no paved streets or <br /> sidewalks and he built it exactly looking like the historic part. He noted they also have one variance on <br /> their property. He read a letter dated August 18, 1980 from Robert J. Harris, the Director of Planning <br /> and Community Development, stating "At their meeting of August 18th, the Board of Adjustment <br /> approved your application for a variance to allow the construction of an attached garage to the <br /> residence located at 4512 Second Street." He also noted that his arborist said 42 feet is the distance <br /> the roots of the tree will go, particularly if there is a house with a basement to the other side. The roots <br /> would be trending toward the subject property. The yellow line indicates 42 feet which is the area <br /> affected by excavation. All along that area, the section of root could be damaged and the tree ruined, <br /> which is a 182 year old Valley Oak. <br /> Christine Bourg said in response to what Mr. Vermont, the land use attorney, said, the laws have <br /> changed. In no other neighborhood in Pleasanton because they have CC&R's could a second home <br /> larger than 1200 square feet be built. Lastly, when Mr. Cunningham said when he stands at Second <br /> Street on Neal looking up and he counts the number of historic homes there, he leaves the first block of <br /> Second Street, which includes the church, the Case Home, Colin Hardware, or 4 properties. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed the public hearing. <br /> Mayor Hosterman said she is even more in favor of this project than she was before starting the <br /> hearing tonight. She thinks that the downtown and neighborhoods are extremely eclectic. There is no <br /> one cookie cutter look for all homes and buildings. It is that mishmash that she thinks is so attractive. <br /> She thinks the Cunningham's have done a marvelous job of trying to meet the neighborhood's overall <br /> look and bringing in a new home in the downtown which she feels goes well with the downtown. She <br /> thinks anytime there is a project, especially in an older space, there are going to be variances. Also, <br /> beauty is in the eye of the beholder and she is trying to be objective about the rules and regulations, but <br /> whether people like the home that is being proposed is pretty subjective. She likes it and there are <br /> some that do not. She thinks one of the biggest issues she heard tonight was of massing. In looking at <br /> other properties on either side of the Cunningham's proposal, there is more massing than in the rest of <br /> the downtown area. She actually thinks what is being proposed is to scale with existing massing of the <br /> neighborhood. Up and down the street are some fairly large houses; some are larger lots and some are <br /> on small lots. She noted that she and her husband had an offer on that property the same time and the <br /> Cunningham's offer came in higher, so she knows what the inside looked like. What they have done <br /> with it is very nice, and they have done a lot to protect the home. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 18 of 25 February 7,2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.