Laserfiche WebLink
John Bartel presented a brief analysis of the agreement's overall impacts. He noted the compounded <br /> impacts of the EPMC adjustment, as the contribution is typically included in pensionable wages when <br /> paid by the City. He also noted that the analysis assumes a July 1, 2011 effective date, resulting in <br /> slightly decreased actuarial savings for the 2011-12 fiscal year. <br /> City Manager Fialho advised that the Council adopted a policy setting forth a PERS Rate Stabilization <br /> Fund that allows the City to begin to affect the unfunded liability. While the Tentative agreement only <br /> begins to gradually address benefit levels, it allows for the opportunity for the 9% EPMC formerly paid <br /> by the City to be put, at least in part, towards that fund to address the negative amortization associated <br /> with the PERS rate. This request will be brought to the Council well in advance of the July 1, 2012 <br /> approval of the operating budget. <br /> Mayor Hosterman opened the for public comment. <br /> Bart Hughes attempted to provide context for the discussion, reviewing contractual and unfunded <br /> liability changes since 2003. He referred to Exhibit A, noting that the cumulative savings identified is <br /> essentially wiped out by the $17 million liability CaIPERS increase in 2011. He said it is clear that <br /> concessions made to date fall short of truly addressing the problem and the longer this continues, the <br /> greater the cost will be to the next generation. He posed the following questions: How do the results of <br /> the Tentative Agreement compare to the Council's improved objectives? Why were the following not <br /> included: Final compensation based on the three highest paid years for all employees; Lengthening of <br /> the retirement age for tier two employees; Narrowing of the definition of "base pay"; More aggressive <br /> adjustments to medical benefits. What flexibility is built into the contract to address future CaIPERS <br /> adjustments? How did the City's 2012 payment on the department's side fund factor into negotiations <br /> and to what extent were other labor groups penalized? To what extent will this agreement hinder the <br /> concessions in last year's PCEA contract? <br /> David Miller said this is about the fiscal situation of the City, not anyone's personal feelings about the <br /> Pleasanton Police Department. He said the Tentative Agreement is a significant improvement over <br /> what was presented last year. He presented a slide depicting the historical growth in police expenses, <br /> which will have doubled since 2000. He appreciated the employees' full contribution of the EPMC, <br /> though considered it to be a bit slow in coming, and said that while 3% at 55 seemed to be in line with <br /> other jurisdictions, it was not in line with the fiscal reality. He stressed that CaIPERS continues to <br /> perform poorly and the City would likely be hit hard again. <br /> Karen de Baca Martens said she is so proud to be part of a City whose police officers are willing to <br /> above and beyond the rest, agreeing to compensation cuts while the city they work for still has <br /> significant budget reserves. She thanked the PPOA for its willingness to ante up and thanked its <br /> officers for their leadership. <br /> Paul Martens questioned the data integrity of information presented by those who remain dissatisfied <br /> with the Tentative Agreement. He asked the Council to trust the integrity of that presented by staff and <br /> consultants and to approve the agreement. <br /> Dave Batory, PPOA President, said the Tentative Agreement is the culmination of months of hard work <br /> and negotiation. This is not the optimal contract for PPOA officers, but it is a decent compromise in <br /> these economically unpredictable times. He reviewed the concessions of the contract, noting that the <br /> EPMC contribution requires officers to contribute $1,000 towards their pension each month. Despite the <br /> fact that Pleasanton's General Fund contains over $20 million in reserves, the officers support this <br /> contract because they care about the community and do not wish to see a reduction in services. PPOA <br /> officers remain 100% committed to serving the residents of this community. <br /> Special City Council Minutes Page 2 of 4 January 4, 2012 <br />