My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
030612
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 1:30:28 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:30:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/6/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Specifications, Terms & Conditions <br /> for Operation and Maintenance Services of Sewer and Water Systems <br /> project? <br /> H. References (See Exhibit M, Item Dl) 10 Points <br /> Oral Presentation and Interview: <br /> The oral presentation by each bidder shall not exceed sixty <br /> (60) minutes in length. The oral interview will consist of <br /> standard questions asked of each of the bidders and specific <br /> questions regarding the specific proposal. The proposals <br /> may then be re-evaluated and re-scored based on the oral <br /> presentation and interview. 15 Points <br /> J. Understanding of the Project: <br /> Proposals will be evaluated against the RFP specifications <br /> and the questions below: <br /> 1. Has proposer demonstrated a thorough understanding of <br /> the purpose and scope of the project? <br /> 2. How well has the proposer identified pertinent issues and <br /> potential problems related to the project? <br /> 3. Has the proposer demonstrated that it understands the <br /> deliverables the County expects it to provide? <br /> 4. Has the proposer demonstrated that it understands the <br /> County's time schedule and can meet it? 10 Points <br /> K. Methodology: <br /> Proposals will be evaluated against the RFP specifications <br /> and the questions below: <br /> 1. Does the methodology depict a logical approach to <br /> fulfilling the requirements of the RFP? <br /> 2. Does the methodology match and contribute to achieving <br /> the objectives set out in the RFP? <br /> 3. Does the methodology interface with the County's time <br /> schedule? 10 Points <br /> Local Preference Five Percent (5%) <br /> Small and Local or Emerging and Local Preference Five Percent (5%) <br /> O. NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD <br /> 1. At the conclusion of the RFP response evaluation process ("Evaluation Process"), <br /> all bidders will be notified in writing by e-mail or fax, and certified mail, of the <br /> contract award recommendation, if any, by GSA— Purchasing. The document <br /> providing this notification is the Notice of Intent to Award. <br /> The Notice of Intent to Award will provide the following information: <br /> • The name of the bidder being recommended for contract award; and <br /> Page 18 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.