My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
022112
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 12:57:00 PM
Creation date
2/14/2012 1:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/10/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
14 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
planter box to accommodate them. He pointed out that Mr. Baker's claim that he <br /> provided all the labor actually created more work for Mr. Pretzel. He questioned why <br /> Mr. Baker's would require Mr. Pretzel use a licensed contractor for any modifications to <br /> the fence when Mr. Baker built the fence on his own without using a licensed contractor. <br /> He reiterated his earlier comment that the tree or bush to cover the fence from view be <br /> planted now. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that the original application, with drawings, which both <br /> Mr. Baker and Mr. Pretzel signed as co-applicants, was not included in the packet and <br /> inquired if staff had a copy handy. <br /> Ms. Soo displayed the documents on the overhead screen. <br /> Commissioner Blank commented that it appears to him that at one point in time, both <br /> Mr. Baker and Mr. Pretzel signed an application indicating the height of the fence. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that surrounding property owners are normally notified <br /> of applications such as this. He inquired if Ms. Fink was notified. <br /> Ms. Soo confirmed that she was. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if Ms. Fink attended the Zoning Administrator hearing. <br /> Ms. Soo replied that she did. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired if the Zoning Administrator findings included one on <br /> landscaping. <br /> Ms. Soo said yes and referred to Condition No. 2 of the Zoning Administrator's approval <br /> letter, Exhibit A of the staff report. <br /> Commissioner.Blank commented that "neighbor versus neighbor" is never a "win-win" <br /> situation. He stated that he is inclined to deny the appeal as both the applicant and the <br /> appellant signed the original application which indicates the height of the fence. <br /> Commissioner Olson agreed and indicated that he has nothing more to add to that. <br /> Commissioners Pentin and Pearce likewise agreed. <br /> Chair Narum inquired what the size of the plant should be. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that Condition No. 2 requires the Director of Community <br /> Development's review and approval of the plant location, species, size, and quantity. <br /> He recommended that the mitigation be done as quickly as possible. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 12-14-2011 Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.