Laserfiche WebLink
VI. PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notices regarding the appeal were mailed to property owners and tenants within 1,000 feet of <br /> the subject property. No one contacted staff at the time this report was prepared. <br /> VII. CONCLUSION <br /> Staff believes that the subject fencing meets that objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and that <br /> the required fence findings can be made. The fencing is constructed of high quality materials <br /> and is consistent with the design, materials, and height of the other existing fencing found <br /> within the neighborhood. The proposed fencing would also provide additional privacy, sound <br /> attenuation, and pool safety compared to shorter fencing. Therefore, staff supports the fencing <br /> as constructed. <br /> VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> Projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 Class 3 — New Construction or <br /> Conversion of Small Structures. Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this <br /> report. <br /> IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the Commission deny the appeal and approve Case P11-0664, subject <br /> to the conditions listed in Exhibit A." <br /> Staff Planner: Rosalind Rondash, Associate Planner, 925.931.5607, or email: rrondash @ci.pleasanton.ca.us <br /> Case No. P11-0664 (Administrative Design Review-Appeal) Planning Commission <br /> Page - 7- <br />