Laserfiche WebLink
I. BACKGROUND <br /> In 1998 new fencing was approved for the rear property line with specific conditions of <br /> approval (Exhibits I and J). That fencing was not built. In August of 2011, Mr. Deike filed an <br /> application for approval for five overheight fences - a recently installed fence along the back of <br /> Mr. Deike's property, overhieght fencing along the right and left side property lines that was <br /> install approximately eight years ago, and for two overheight fences located within the side <br /> yards of the subject site. All of the said fencing was installed without benefit of City approval <br /> prior to their installations. <br /> The recent installation of the rear yard fencing triggered an enforcement case. As a result of <br /> the enforcement case, Mr. Deike was required to apply for administrative design approval for <br /> all overheight fencing on-site that was not previously approved. Notice of the overheight <br /> fencing was sent to surrounding neighbors on September 20, 2011. Carl Pretzel, property <br /> owner of 3633 Glacier Court, requested a hearing on the subject fencing. <br /> On October 4, 2011, the Zoning Administrator held a hearing on the subject fencing. The <br /> Zoning Administrator approved the fencing subject to conditions. On October 14, 2011, Mr. <br /> Pretzel filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's decision. His appeal is currently before <br /> the Planning Commission for consideration. <br /> II. SITE DESCRIPTION <br /> The properties of the applicant (3642 Carlsbad Way) and the appellant (3633 Glacier Court <br /> North) are located back to back and are occupied by existing single family homes (see Figure <br /> 1 on the next page). <br /> Mr. Deike's property itself is relatively flat; however, there is a minor elevation difference <br /> between 3642 Carlsbad Way and 3633 Glacier Court North, in that 3633 Glacier Court North is <br /> approximately 1 to 3 inches lower than 3642 Carlsbad Way. The subject property (3642 <br /> Carlsbad Way contains an existing swimming pool in the rear yard. <br /> Case No. P11-0664 (Administrative Design Review-Appeal) Planning Commission <br /> Page - 2 - <br />