My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
022112
>
11 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 12:18:04 PM
Creation date
2/14/2012 1:43:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/10/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Rondash replied that there were none. She added that all five fences on the <br /> property were built without permits. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he is normally insensitive to concerns of applicants <br /> who build without City approval; however, building a fence six inches taller than the <br /> approved six-foot, six-inch fence is not much of a difference to require that six inches be <br /> shaved off the top of the fence to make it the same height as the adjacent fences. He <br /> noted that a variety of fencing styles in a neighborhood is not unusual, and this fence is <br /> well-built, the design looks nice, and it meets all the codes. He indicated that he is <br /> inclined to say this is a challenge, but he will support staff's recommendation to deny <br /> the appeal and allow the fence. <br /> Commissioner Pearce prefaced her comments by stating that neighborhood issues are <br /> the most challenging to deal with because it is an emotional issue and is difficult for all <br /> concerned. She indicated that she lives in an older neighborhood, and every section of <br /> her fence is a little bit different from one another. She stated that she will try to judge <br /> this application based on the Municipal code, if it is aesthetically appropriate and safe. <br /> She added that she feels for everyone involved but agrees with Commissioner Blank <br /> that there is not enough material to require the applicant to tear the fence down. <br /> Commissioner Olson stated that he has been through this process twice when he and <br /> his neighbor decided to build a seven-foot tall fence between their properties and did <br /> not realize that it required a permit. He added that the second time, it was a six-foot tall <br /> fence right down the property line he shared with another neighbor, and each of them <br /> paid for half of the cost and agreed to finish their sides of the fence the way they chose. <br /> He noted that the newfence is a great improvement over Mr. Pretzel's fence as shown <br /> on the picture, and it is beyond him how the fence could be left that way for a long time <br /> He stated that he would support'denying the appeal. <br /> Commissioner Pentin concurred with the statements of the previous Commissioners. <br /> Commission O'Connor stated that he was not quite sure why the old fence looks shorter <br /> than the extension which is,supposedly six feet tall. He noted that if this section is to <br /> remain, there would be a one-foot step up with the seven-foot tall fence, which would <br /> not be a big deal and could be remedied with landscaping. He added that the new <br /> fence looks well-built. <br /> Chair Narum agreed. She stated that she has two to three fences across her backyard <br /> that all look different, but she and her neighbors agreed with one another, paid their <br /> share of the installation, and mutually maintain the fence. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 12-14-2011 Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.