My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
022112
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2012 2:11:54 PM
Creation date
2/14/2012 1:41:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 5 <br /> Ms. Kaufman <br /> October 21,2011 <br /> If the Waste Management Authority adopts a Countywide Ordinance,then it has some <br /> responsibility in ensuring the enforcement of the ordinance. The draft ordinance has been <br /> revised to maximize local control by allowing each jurisdiction to approve or disapprove each <br /> and every enforcement action through their designated Primary Enforcement Representative. <br /> Primary enforcement representative is defined as the chief executive of a covered jurisdiction <br /> or a qualified designee who will coordinate with the Authority regarding implementation of the <br /> Ordinance. Complete enforcement by each member agency is best done under a member <br /> agency ordinance, per the advice of our legal counsel. <br /> 8. The passage of AB 341 creates a statewide regulation that meets the intent of the <br /> proposed ordinance <br /> AB 341 will require considerable effort for compliance and the implementation of a similar <br /> countywide ordinance creates uncertainty and an unnecessary duplication of effort. We <br /> recommend the Authority focus its limited resources on supporting Alameda County <br /> jurisdictions in the implementation of this State law in lieu of adopting and implementing its <br /> proposed ordinance. <br /> Cal Recycle who has developed much of the language contained in AB 341,via a Draft <br /> Mandatory Recycling Regulation (which was replaced by AB 341), and who is charged with <br /> implementing AB 341, has stated that a Countywide Mandatory Recycling Ordinance is <br /> consistent with the intent of AB 341.AB 341 also says that a Mandatory Recycling Ordinance <br /> can be used to help implement this law locally. The draft Countywide Ordinance does go <br /> beyond the state law in that it requires businesses to obtain the adequate level of recycling <br /> service as opposed to the minimal level possible. Ultimately, this should yield a more efficient <br /> and less costly solid waste system for all haulers and rate payers,given the fact that maximizing <br /> recycling has a lower net cost overall,than maximizing refuse collection. Each city will need to <br /> consider for themselves what or whether transitional costs are needed in the short term to <br /> achieve an overall more efficient system in the long run. <br /> Comments regarding ordinance to regulate the use of carryout bags and promote the use of <br /> reusable bags. <br /> 9. Carryout bag restrictions and distribution of reusable bags <br /> We are requesting that Section 4(b) and 4(c) be amended by replacing the word may with the <br /> word shall to ensure that businesses are equally subject to ordinance compliance as it relates to <br /> the sale of recycled paper or reusable bags. <br /> This is a simple misunderstanding of the section. All businesses are equally subject to the <br /> ordinance as it relates to the sale of recycled paper or reusable bags. Our ordinance uses the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.