My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN120611
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
CCMIN120611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2012 1:35:37 PM
Creation date
2/9/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN120611
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
any of the sites can be zoned at higher densities. She pointed out in the HCD comments that if they <br /> want to use acreage to count as fulfillment, a minimum density standard must be set for development of <br /> a site. This way they can roll up the acreage to meet up the need. Lastly, she encouraged more of the <br /> questions on what is needed to get a bullet-proof Housing Element. By dealing with the Hacienda <br /> question to say it is the conditions, it is the core standards that are the obstacle to use of that site. She <br /> also asked the Council to address policy questions like the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance and growth <br /> management policy which will help staff arrive at details. <br /> James Paxson thanked staff, the Council and Commission for all the work done over the last several <br /> months, expressed their support for staff's recommendations for the Hacienda properties and said they <br /> have also reviewed the sites within the park and enjoy the overwhelming support of other park owners. <br /> One thing they would like to continue to work with staff on is to make sure that with the new General <br /> Plan designation received as well as complexities with their PUD, that the final zoning designations <br /> offered mesh. He asked if there was a possibility to have these all be designated mixed use, <br /> recognizing there are some constraints the City is up against with HCD. <br /> Steve Dunn, representing Legacy Partners (Site 14) and part of the east Pleasanton area, said they are <br /> also very disappointed they have not been included when they have been the entire time. They were <br /> very active and vetted in the efficient process, appreciates everybody's time and work, and said in the <br /> process it was determined that east Pleasanton was one of the best places for housing need which has <br /> left them surprised. Their site specifically is ready for development. They have utilities, private access <br /> out and they thought the process was very fair. They were looking for an equitable solution that spread <br /> out the needs across the City and now they believe it is over-weighted to the west and recommend this <br /> be reconsidered. They would also like to encourage and plead for a timely process for the long awaited <br /> specific plan. <br /> Lauri Fehlberg, Dahlen Architecture Planning, said they are currently working with the Kiewit site (11) <br /> and have been active during this entire process. From an urban design standpoint, she pointed to a <br /> map showing that they are entirely within the City limits and the entire 50 acres is only 5% of the <br /> specific plan area. When looking closer at what a 10-acre site within the site looks like, it is only 1% of <br /> the specific plan area. When talking about missed opportunities in a 1,000 acre specific plan because <br /> they will look at 10 acres "ahead of time", this is the tail wagging the dog, and this parcel would start to <br /> fill in the Iron Horse Trail corridor along the valley. This starts to give some closure to Valley Avenue <br /> from a connectivity standpoint and she urged the Commission and Council to look at this, as it is a <br /> small component of the overall plan from an urban design and community standpoint. <br /> Mike Serpa, Nearon Enterprises, said the process has been long and one which has been very well <br /> done and he thanked the City for including their site. He pointed out some product considerations to <br /> consider. Early on there was a tour of high density projects and sometimes it is hard to understand <br /> what 20-30-40 units to the acre looks like. They were pretty flexible in going to the 23 units or at 30 <br /> units and the reason why they talked about 23 at the time because the Verona community is across the <br /> street and there was a product consideration in 2003 at a higher density range. When getting up to 30 <br /> on their site, this is an apartment podium style project. They thought if they could have 23, they could <br /> have the flexibility and if they had a project that came in at 25 or 26 units to the acre, it would not <br /> materially affect their contribution to the City's green needs, and at the same time, have 2 side-by-side <br /> garages, as opposed to 10 garages. So, there is a specific product type you can put on site between a <br /> 23 to a 25 and a 30 unit to the acre project. He asked that this be considered and either way, they will <br /> move forward, are ready to go and he will look forward to working with staff in designing and developing <br /> it. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed the public comment. <br /> Commissioner Pearce asked Mr. Dolan to speak to why the CarrAmerica site was lowered from 40 to <br /> 30 units to the acre. Mr. Dolan said early on, staff asked them as they did Stoneridge whether they <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 18 December 6,2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.