My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
020812 Joint Workshop
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 4:31:09 PM
Creation date
2/3/2012 12:35:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/8/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Building Design <br /> To address design comments from staff and the Planning Commission at the October 17, <br /> 2011 work session, the applicant has made the following design changes. Staff notes that <br /> unless otherwise noted, the items below apply to both sites. <br /> 8. More delineation between the residential and retail units should be incorporated into <br /> the design to give a sense of separation. <br /> Comments: The retail units have metal awnings and 12-foot tall storefront windows <br /> and the live/work units have 10-foot tall storefront windows to identify and delineate <br /> them from the residential units. Please refer to sheet A2-3 in Attachment 1, Exhibit <br /> B-1 and sheet A2-11 in Attachment 2, Exhibit B-2. The addition of "Lobby" signs <br /> and "Retail" signs have been added over the entries to also delineate the two uses. <br /> For Site 1, the applicant has differentiated the residential units from the retail units <br /> by using different colors (i.e., blue for retail and a soft beige for residential) in <br /> addition to incorporating exposed concrete along the base of the retail units Please <br /> refer to Attachment 1, Exhibit B-1, sheet A2-3. <br /> 9. The stairwells/lobby entries do not provide a sense of entry to the elevator lobby or <br /> walk-up building lobby. Clear indication and methods of security (card/key entry) <br /> for the front doors should be incorporated into the plans. A substantial ground floor <br /> lobby and entry storefront with a security system (e.g., card/key entry or call buzzer) <br /> for visitors should be considered. <br /> Comments: The type of security method for lobby entrances, if any, is not indicated <br /> on the plans. The applicant has revised the plans to highlight the stairwells/lobby <br /> areas with accent colors, overhangs with entry signs, and recessed entryways. <br /> Please refer to sheets A2-3, A2-7, and A2-11 in Attachment 1, Exhibit B-1 and <br /> sheet A2-7 in Attachment 2, Exhibit B-2. <br /> 10.A primary entry lobby would establish a hierarchy of entries so that the individual <br /> ground floor entries are smaller than the primary building entries. The entries could <br /> then have canopies and signage for each primary entry, which would highlight the <br /> entries to the building. <br /> Comments: The plans have been revised to highlight the stairwells/lobby areas <br /> with accent colors, overhangs with entry signs, and recessed entryways. Please <br /> refer to sheet A2-11 in Attachment 1, Exhibit B-1 and Attachment 2, Exhibit B-2. <br /> 11.The proposed score lines in the building wall are a key architectural detail. More <br /> detail on how these will be accomplished is necessary in order to determine <br /> whether the approach will result in a satisfactory appearance. <br /> Comments: Plan sheets of the buildings color and material details have been <br /> incorporated into the plans to assist in the level of detail that will be achieved. <br /> Please refer to sheets A6-0 through A6-3 in Attachment 1, Exhibit B-1 and <br /> Attachment 2, Exhibit B-2. <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.