Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Van Cleave confirmed that was correct. <br /> <br />Pratap Poddatoori, property owner, thanked the Commission for giving him this <br />opportunity and stated that there have been suggestions and issues that they have <br />been working on for over a year and a half. He indicated that he is very excited about <br />the house and would like build it and move forward with the approval process promptly. <br /> <br />Don Errigo, adjacent neighbor, stated that he has lived at this location for ten years. He <br />indicated that he purchased this property because of its privacy; it is a great sanctuary, <br />and he and his wife love Pleasanton and are very involved in the area. He stated that <br />he has been working with staff and the applicant regarding resolving some of their <br />concerns, and they have worked through some of them. He expressed concern about <br />the preservation of the oak trees in his property, noting that a construction on Bethel <br />Lane adjacent to their property resulted in water draining from that property onto theirs, <br />and they lost a 150-year old heritage oak tree which was positioned quite well and <br />screened that house and another house. He indicated that they are very sensitive to <br />the fact that any sort of building can have adverse consequences to the heritage oak <br />trees on their property or other properties, and they want to make sure that drainage <br />goes towards Foothill and not the other way. <br /> <br />Mr. Errigo stated that his other concern is privacy and thanked Commissioner Olson for <br />bringing up the matter of story poles. He indicated that he is also speaking on behalf of <br />the Weiners, neighbors who could not be present tonight. He noted that anyone could <br />Photoshop these perspectives <br />, but story poles would resolve everything. He <br />stated that the Weiners are hoping that story poles be required on that side of the <br />property so they can have an accurate understanding about where the line of sight will <br />be and what viewsheds will need to be mitigated by planting. He indicated that one of <br />his big concerns about privacy is the balcony, which had been reduced from three or <br />four feet deep to a foot deep so it still retains the aesthetics of the house without <br />allowing someone to look down upon their property. He noted that the view shed looks <br />directly into their master bathroom, which has a big glass atrium, and this has been <br />resolved. <br /> <br />Mr. Errigo stated that it is important that planting happens before construction. He <br />indicated that he has had an experience with this in connection with the construction of <br />another house on Bethel Lane, which was required to have some planting that never <br />occurred after the construction of the house, and then the property was sold. He <br />reiterated that it is important that the planting occurs, that it has trees that are mature, <br />and that it is dense. <br /> <br />Mr. Van Cleave stated that privacy is a two-way street and that the Poddatooris are <br />conscious of that. He indicated that they respect that and want to provide that, and they <br />have done nothing to try to create a privacy issue with any of the neighbors. He stated <br />that from their observations, there are some minor privacy issues that can be effectively <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 9, 2011 Page 6 of 29 <br /> <br />