My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 110911
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 110911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 11:25:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
neighborhood instead of a detriment. The historic Hall home could return to its <br />historic status as one of the most regal in all of Pleasanton and the cottage could <br />continue to provide a unit of much-needed affordable housing. <br /> <br />urge Mr. & Mrs. Cunningham to devote their energies to restoring the historic <br /> <br /> <br />Christine Bourg, neighbor, stated that she lived for 37 years right next to the vintage <br />cottage being discussed, formerly owned by the Hall family. She indicated that she has <br />spoken to the Planning Commission at least twice in the past asking for a denial of the <br />proposal, and she is asking to do so again tonight. She indicated that the proposal to <br />demolish the 482-square-foot cottage and replace it with a 1,844-square-foot two-story <br />house is wrong for many reasons. She pointed out that it would spoil the integrity of the <br />heritage neighborhood which is one of the first subdivisions in Pleasanton, divided by <br />Joshua Neal. She added that this block on the south side of Neal Street includes the <br /> which is now the Baptist <br />Church, the homes of Joshua Neal, banker E.L. Benedict, Game Warden Frank <br />Donahue which is our home, store owners, Buford Hall, and Jack Collin. She noted that <br />these historic buildings were all constructed between 1850 and 1910 and are cherished <br />by those who own them and by the residents of Pleasanton, including school children <br />and adults who tour the downtown, as well as by visitors to Pleasanton who may wish <br />their own hometowns have preserved the past so well. She added that another reason <br />she opposes this plan is that if approved, it would set a dangerous precedent and would <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Bourg presented photographs of the story poles taken from her kitchen window. <br />She stated that there were no windows on the original plan, but they recently went to <br />City Hall to look at the plans and saw that there are two windows on the second story. <br />She noted that those windows and the front deck on the second story of the proposed <br />property would invade their privacy because they face their kitchen, their family room, <br />and their bathroom. She indicated that she talked with the Chief Building Official about <br />the height of the windows, and he stated that the windows had to serve as a fire escape <br />and would be too high at six feet. She noted that the room is also listed as a study but <br />could be used as a bedroom. She also noted that main vegetation referred to between <br />the two properties is low; the largest one on their side is a 25-foot-tall Photinia tree <br />which would block some of the building; however, Photinias have a short lifespan, and <br />this one is about 30 years old. She stated that they did not have 30 years to grow <br />anything that would hide the building. She added that the plan would also spoil their <br />lovely eastern view of the historic Hall home and the hills and trees beyond. <br /> <br />Ms. Bourg stated that another issue which was also brought up earlier is that this home <br />provides affordable rental housing which she encourages, and there are single mothers <br />in Pleasanton who cannot afford an apartment. With respect to the three variances in <br />addition to the one already granted, she indicated that because the lot is not deep <br />enough, the proposed structure would sit too close to the street. She noted that this is a <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 9, 2011 Page 19 of 29 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.