PC 110911 - Laserfiche WebLink

best visual is the one that shows where the crest of the hill is and where the house is going down the other side. He indicated that the story poles would just confirm this and nothing more. He added that seeing a better and revised landscape plan would be more appropriate. He stated that he did not want to delay the project any further and that he thinks the neighbors have worked quite well together. He added that if Mr. Dolan is confident that the landscape plan could be revised to take care of any privacy issues, then the project would be a winner. Commissioner Pentin inquired if the Commission wished to add a condition that the storm water runoff drain to the front of the property. stated that he thinks that was required by law. Commissioner Pentin noted that staff had mentioned that this condition could be added. Commissioner Pentin stated it would ensure that the routing of storm water would not inadvertently end up on the side of the hill. Mr. Dolan stated that this condition can be added as long as it is unders review may show that there is no water going in that direction and, therefore, nothing would need to be done. Commissioner Pentin moved to make the Conditional Use Permit findings listed in the staff report and to approve Case P11-0002 and P11-0003, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A, with the addition of a condition that the storm water runoff would be routed to the front of the property as part of the revised landscape plan. motion. Chair Narum requested a modification to Condition No. 2 to change color of window dark . With respect to Condition No. 19, Commissioner Pearce inquired if an applicant is typically required to look at school impact fees for an addition. Ms. Stern said yes and that is calculated per square footage. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 9, 2011 Page 10 of 29