PC 101711 Special Mtg - Laserfiche WebLink

noted that coordinating sustainability and energy programs with economic development features is important because the City wants to attract businesses that will fit within the CAP and will make us sustainable as we go forward. He indicated that the most important thing that he has talked to the City Council and Senior Management about is to lead by example and practice sustainability within local government before we can expect our community to do that. He added that the City has have been very proactive, and it has been a very successful program. Mr. Smith stated that the City can take credit for roughly a little over half of the emissions it has to reduce through the requirements of State law, such as the effects for passenger vehicle emissions, low carbon fuel standards, and renewal portfolio standards for PG&E. He indicated that what are left are the green ones that are built He noted that the numbers on the final CAP have changed a bit because when the Plan was taken to Council, the public education engagement piece, which is one of the most important, was still happening. He added, however, that a lot of these were integrated into the Energy programs rather than the education piece, although this is mere cosmetic as the content remains the same. Commissioner Olson inquired what means. Mr. Smith replied that since the price of fuel has gone up so much, people are buying less gas as they are not traveling as much, which results in a decrease in the production of GHG. Commissioner Olson inquired if there is a built-in assumption that this will continue. Mr. Smith said yes, because fuel prices will continue go up rather than down. He noted that this was recognized by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and the Alameda County Transportation model and that we can take credit for that as well. Commissioner Pentin stated that he thinks this would extend further with respect to the 2020 requirements as the cost of fuel is supposed to rise at about 39 percent by 2020. Mr. Smith agreed and indicated that the increase in the cost of fuel is built into the model. Mr. Smith then presented the big picture of what the City needs to do. He explained that If we took the 2005 numbers and we wanted to be down to the 1990 levels by 2020, and if we took the General Plan and took the number of houses and businesses we were going to add and we did not do anything, we would actually have to reduce our GHG emissions by over 30 percent by 2020; the rate of reduction from 1990 to 2005 is only 15 percent. He indicated that the State measures get us back to the baseline, and the fuel impacts, the fuel price, and the CAP measures actually take us to about 20,000 metric tons further than what we need. He noted that these numbers were revised to above 12,000, which is still well over the target, and part of the reason for this PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 17, 2011 Page 29 of 36