My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 101711 Special Mtg
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 101711 Special Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 11:23:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Narum noted this was of concern to her as well and that she would like to see <br />some caps, not the huge ones but something similar to those on Site 1, to break up the <br />flat lines a little bit. She referred to a drawing which she noted resembles a long stretch. <br /> <br />Mr. Yau indicated that it makes sense and that they would not be opposed to revising <br />and providing this detail. <br /> <br />Commissioners <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that she discussed this concern with the applicant when <br />she met with him today. She indicated that when she was on the Hacienda Task Force, <br />the Task Force had significant discussions on creating community and making sure that <br />these types of developments were not self-enclosed entities but really created <br />community. She referred to the one adjacent to the residential and stated that she <br />would have hoped to have seen more stoops and more places where people can <br />congregate, not only outside at the corner but also inside within the complex. She <br />stated that she sees a lot of garages and not as many places that are natural gathering <br />. She noted that similar to the discussion on porches in <br />a suburban community, stoops and things like that create a community in an urban <br />environment. She indicated that this is something she would have hoped to have seen <br />because she drives by more dense projects in other areas and it is like a ghost town <br />because there is no one around, which she finds sad. <br /> <br />Chair Narum referred to a rendering of a building with a white section on the far left, <br />which struck her as looking institutional with its institutional-sized windows. She noted <br />that it seems to have lost some detail and asked the applicant to look into it, indicating <br />that she was not certain what should be done with it. She also pointed out the long <br />stretch on the back side and referred to a similar design on another building facing close <br />to another building but is not as visible. <br /> <br />C. Are the proposed building colors and materials acceptable? <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that the warmer colors on this property are fine, especially <br />because of the residential area across from the site. He noted that they work a lot <br />better for this area but would not work on Owens Drive. <br /> <br />Commissioners Olson and Blank agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce and Chair Narum indicated that they would like to see large color <br />samples. <br /> <br />D. Is the positioning of the buildings acceptable? <br /> <br />The Commission was supportive of the proposed positioning of the buildings. <br /> <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 17, 2011 Page 25 of 36 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.