Laserfiche WebLink
demolition, they would just start over and would not try to save anything; but she does <br />not believe this is a demolition at all. <br /> <br />Ms. Ladd continued that she then looked at the definition of remodel: <br />altering the structure, style, or fo <br />She stated that she feels this is definitely much more of a description of what they are <br />trying to do. She noted that the entry way, the trellis detailing, the window placement, <br />and the architectural details were all carried over to the new design, and she believed <br />that their project qualifies, both literally and in spirit, as renewing and renovating rather <br />than demolishing. <br /> <br />Ms. Ladd stated that to further understand this concept, she did a Google-search on <br />remodel versus demolition and on the first three pages that came up, <br />she found two things relevant to this discussion: (1) an article in Austin, Texas, <br />discussing the determination process as follows: odel if it <br />meets two criteria: first, the original wall remains, referring to the studs of that original <br />wall; and second, Ms. Ladd pointed out that their <br />project would meet those two criteria. (2) the New York CityDepartment of Building <br />websiteFrequently Asked Questions page: <br />building including the foundation. In an alteration, you may remove interior and exterior <br />walls but not the entire foundation. An alteration can be the addition of stories and <br />Ms. Ladd again <br />noted that she thinks their project qualifies completely with that as they are keeping the <br />entire foundation and front wall, and they are just widening and extending out the back. <br />She stated that while they are not in Austin or New York City, she would take these as <br />starting points for her understanding of both terms, considering that Pleasanton does <br />not have anything to reference and these were the only two things she found, both of <br />which say more or less the same thing. <br /> <br />With respect to the stone river rock and the wood pillars staff requested, Ms. Ladd <br />stated that they had some feedback from the Pleasanton Heritage Association (PHA) <br />that it would like to see a little more Craftsman detail; however, at that time, it had not <br />seen their colored rendering which highlights their design details, which includes a nice <br />color band around the bottom and the redwood siding on the front, along the lines of <br />what staff is asking to break the monotony shown in the model and streetscape. She <br />noted that this has always been their intention that did not get highlighted in the model, <br />whose purpose was simply to show physically what the project would look like in 3-D. <br /> <br />Ms. Ladd stated that their architects and designers have worked a lot and have gone <br />through so many different renditions of this project. She indicated that they feel the <br />charming Craftsman details have been integrated into the design, and they do not <br />understand where the wood and river rock elements are coming from. She noted that <br />they drove down the street and took a picture of every home on the street which they <br />have submitted to staff, and there is not a single home that has wood columns or river <br />rock in the neighborhood. She added that they have tried to incorporate some of the <br />original character of the home and to make it blend in with the neighborhood. She <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 14, 2011 Page 20 of 28 <br /> <br />