My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 030911
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 030911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 10:52:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Program 5.2: ons contained within archaeological and <br />historical architecture studies regarding rehabilitation or preservation of archaeologically <br /> He noted that this suggests relying on <br />professional opinion. <br /> <br />Referring to Program 5.2, Commissioner Pentin gave an example of someone who <br />wants to take a house out, and someone else gets a historical architect who <br />recommends that the house needs to be preserved for certain reasons. He inquired if <br />the decision-makers then have to go back to the General Plan and state that they are <br />following the recommendation of a professional. He further inquired if this Program is <br />written in stone or is a gray area. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he thinks it is a gray area but suggests that a professional opinion <br />should be consulted. He added that the DTSP gets even more specific. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank stated that one of the reasons it is a gray area is because an <br />applicant can then find another expert witness who would state that it is not a historical <br />or archaeological area of significance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that <br />definition that something or someone significant happened in this place. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that these are standards provided for the City by the State, and cities <br />do not necessarily have to stick with those standards. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if that was the intent of the statement. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he was not sure whether this was the intent of the General Plan; <br />however, in the specifics of the DTSP, it comes right out and references those. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan then referred to Program 5.4, which clearly outlines a specific direction to <br />which the City commits itself: <br />prHe noted <br />that the terminology ,mentions <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that this appears to be in divergence from the DTSP which <br />talks about districts or areas. He stated that without knowing the intent of the person <br />who wrote the language, it would be difficult to determine if <br />implies taking inventory of every building in Pleasanton and going through them one by <br />one to identify which are and which are not significant so there is no question. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that historic buildings are located in pretty isolated areas that have <br />been identified. He noted that the Downtown Design Guidelines references four or five <br />different neighborhoods, and the City has a documentation of a whole series of experts <br />starting in 1978, done every five years and reviewed by different individuals with <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, March 9, 2011 Page 4 of 24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.