My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 030911
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 030911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 10:52:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Theater, which he considers to be a very successful project in the sense that it is not <br />widely different from the general character of the Downtown. He indicated that it is a <br />successful civic statement not only of what Pleasanton was at one point but also the <br />direction it is headed toward. <br /> <br />Mr. Colson noted that there are some very important values the community is wrangling <br />with and there is opportunity for diversity and debate to occur, and the decision-makers <br />need to come back to those values. He stated that the question is whether to fossilize <br />or create vitality. He indicated that he felt Planning staff understands the importance of <br />allowing that variety to occur, which creates a rich and lively environment. He stated <br />that this is where he would like to see Pleasanton move toward and noted that it is <br />important to listen to professional opinion because there is a lot of subjectivity. <br /> <br />Mr. Colson stated that the City should identify those properties that are classic and <br />significant either culturally or architecturally, and then allow for room for new things to <br />occur. He complimented whatever process was in place which allowed for the <br />Firehouse Arts Theater to happen because therein lies the key to where the City should <br />go. He indicated that the danger of creating very strict ordinances is an issue of <br />economics as well, as there are economic realities in doing preservation as opposed to <br />conservation. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin expressed his appreciation for the materials received, <br />presentation, and public comment received. He stated that he does not believe the <br />system is broken, but some updating could be done on the DTSP and the DTDG. He <br />noted that addressing this in the near future would answer some of the questions raised <br />regarding streamlining and allfrustration. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson complimented Mr. Dolan on his presentation and indicated that he <br />would not support an ordinance. He stated that there is enough on paper now which <br />can be refined and believes that some diversity in the area is called for. He indicated <br />that he likes the analogy about the Firehouse Arts Center project having something old <br />and something new and noted that he would not be surprised that this is where the <br />Commission is headed. <br /> <br />d with Commissioners Pentin and Olson. He indicated <br />that there are documents in place that get applicants where they need to go, although, <br />there are some inconsistencies that should be updated to flow properly. He stated that <br />would also not support another ordinance to layer on top of those the City already has. <br />He noted that people who buy historically significant homes would know it when they <br />see it and hoped they do not buy one just to tear it down. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, March 9, 2011 Page 18 of 24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.