My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 030911
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 030911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 10:52:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Pearce asked Mr. Huff if he has had any experience with the concept of <br />neighborhood conservation districts. <br /> <br />Mr. Huff said yes. He added that he believes such a district should still rely on the <br />bureaucracy of staff in terms of interpretation and should not have the ability to regulate. <br />He stated that he thinks it has similar enforcement ability as a historic preservation <br />ordinance, and the ultimate authority of whether a structure can be added onto should <br />lie with staff. <br /> <br />Mike Carey, Downtown property owner and real estate broker, stated that his family <br /> <br />He indicated that he is not in favor of a historic preservation ordinance until the Planning <br />Division becomes more user-friendly. He noted that he, along with many others, <br />worked on a Customer Service Review Task Force (CSRT) sponsored by the City which <br />was commissioned to streamline the work of the different City departments, and he <br />thinks the document produced by CSRT would be a great instrument to help expedite <br />the Planning efficiency. <br /> <br />Mr. Carey stated that the notification process for this meeting did not adequately notice <br />property owners who will be affected by the altering of their property rights. He noted <br />that many of his clients indicate that staff does not follow any clear set of rules and that <br />there are confusing criteria for development. He indicated that Mr. <br />regarding utilizing outside experts and agreeing with their findings is untrue, noting that <br />in the last 100 days, there have been three applicants required by the City to perform a <br />historic evaluation, and results have been disregarded by the Commission, City Council, <br />and staff. He stated that this is very discouraging for the applicants and that staff has <br />been unfriendly, subjective, and unclear to work with. In conclusion, he asked that the <br />City survey Downtown applicants of the last two years to obtain feedback and <br />documented responses. <br /> <br />Jon Harvey, Downtown property owner, stated that said he came into the process <br />having the experience of having built a custom home in Kottinger Ranch in the late <br />noted that he was on the Planning Commission for a year and on the Zoning <br />Board with the County for six years; he has attended urban design conferences, has <br />friends who are land use attorneys, and feels he is pretty well-informed. <br /> <br />Mr. Harvey stated that he purchased a lot on Neal Street, studied the DTSP, DTDG, <br />zoning ordinance, and second unit ordinance, and hired an architect. He added that he <br />met with the former Planning Director Jerry Iserson and Principal Planner Donna <br />Decker, who recommended that he talk with the neighbors, who while recognizing that <br />he had the right to build a house on the property, did not want a house built there. He <br />indicated that he submitted the plans, went through design review and the PHA forms, <br />and got through the process after changing the door, roof, and trees based on <br />neighborhood feedback. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, March 9, 2011 Page 16 of 24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.