Laserfiche WebLink
4.Written Comments on the Draft EIR and Responses to Comments <br /> Letter 8. Legacy Partners <br /> (Steven Dunn, Senior Managing Director) <br /> 8-1 The comment describes a reduction of residential buildout on Site 14 in Alternatives I <br /> and 2,which were not uniformly required of the other potential sites for rezoning in the <br /> East Pleasanton Specific Plan area. It should be noted that Alternatives 1 and 2 show <br /> residential development at 276 units rather than 273 as stated in Letter 8. The comment <br /> does not raise any substantive issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft SEIR, but <br /> discusses proposals contained in the Housing Element itself. The comment is noted. <br /> 8-2 The comment requests clarification of Mitigation Measure 4.N-7 that the payment of <br /> traffic impact fees, would occur"at the issuance of building permits."As noted in Table <br /> 6-I of Chapter 6, Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program, Mitigation Measure <br /> 4.N-7 would be required prior to issuance of building permit(s). <br /> The following edit is made to Impact 4.N-7 on page 4.N-31 of the Draft SEIR: <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.N-7: Prior to issuance of building permit(s),the City shall require <br /> developers on the potential sites for rezoning to contribute fair-share funds through the <br /> payment of the City of Pleasanton and Tri-Valley Regional traffic impact fees to help fund <br /> future improvements to local and regional roadways. <br /> 8-3 The comment requests clarification of minimum average or mean density per acre as <br /> described on page 3-8 of the Draft SEIR. The reference to density per acre refers to the <br /> average density over the entirety of the site. <br /> The following footnote is added to the fourth full paragraph on page 3-8 of the Draft <br /> SEIR: <br /> I The units per acre refers to the average density over the entirety of the site. <br /> 8-4 The comment correctly notes that the reference to a 40-arce park on the east side of <br /> Pleasanton on page 4.M-4 of the Draft SEIR should be corrected to a 38-acre park. <br /> The following edit is made to the last sentence of the third paragraph on page 4.M-4 of <br /> the Draft SEIR: <br /> A planned 38-40-acre park would be sited on reclaimed quarry lands to the east side of <br /> Pleasanton; this park may include sports fields or serve as a gateway to the Chain of <br /> Lakes in the area. <br /> General Plan Amendment and Rezonings 4-27 ESA/210016 <br /> Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report December2011 <br />