Laserfiche WebLink
2.Revisions to the Draft EIR <br /> TABLE 4.E-5 <br /> PROJECTED EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS FROM PLEASANTON <br /> CLIMATE ACTION PLAN STRATEGIES <br /> Annual GHG <br /> Reduction Potential <br /> Strategy (MT CO2e) <br /> SW2 Increase recycling,organics diversion,and waste reduction associated with the entire 29505 <br /> community <br /> EC2 Leverage outside programs to increase energy efficiency 19449 17,304 <br /> EC4 Develop programs to increase energy efficiency 9,342 <br /> EC3 Establish and promote financing and financial incentive programs to support energy 7 416 <br /> efficiency <br /> LU1 Support infill and higher density development 6,898 <br /> TDM2 Promote altematives to work and school commutes 11257 6558 <br /> LU2 Support mixed-use infill and new development near local-serving commercial areas 5,845 <br /> EC1 Use city codes,ordinances,and permitting to enhance green building and energy 3,807 3;713 <br /> efficiency <br /> TDM1 Use parking pricing/policy to discourage SOV travel 3,174 <br /> ER1 Implement local ordinances and permitting processes to support renewable energy 2,389 <br /> TR1 Improve transit system and ridership 2,377 <br /> LU3 Improve transportation efficiency through design improvements 2,202 <br /> ER2 Develop programs to promote on-site renewable energy to the community 1,519 <br /> NM1 Create and maintain a safe,convenient,and effective system for pedestrians and 1 260 <br /> bicyclists <br /> EGI Promote green building and energy efficient development for government operations 10518 1,104 <br /> and city infrastructure <br /> VE2 Develop a city fleet replacement program 312 <br /> WAI Conserve community water through building and landscape design and 272 <br /> improvements <br /> WA3 Increase or establish use of reclaimed/grey water systems 98 <br /> WA2 Conserve municipal operations water 1 <br /> Total 117436144,649 <br /> Note:This table is from the Draft CAP,Table 3-2.See Chapter 3 of the CAP for a full and detailed description of each of these <br /> strategies,and Appendix D for detailed information on methods and assumptions used to quantify emissions reductions.See <br /> Appendix B for Baseline and Future Year VMT Estimates,and Appendix C for VMT reduction associated with CAP implementation. <br /> implementing the proposed Draft CAP, the City would achieve consistency with the provisions of <br /> AB 32 as interpreted by the BAAQMD by meeting the community-wide emissions reduction <br /> target of 15 percent below its 2005 baseline by the year 2020. Thus, impacts related to <br /> greenhouse gas emissions would be considered less than significant. <br /> The following edits have been made on page 4.J-25 of the Drat SEIR: <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.J-5a: Prior to prier-to PUD approval, if a potential site for <br /> rezoning would add traffic noise in excess exceed of 55 dBA as described in Table 4.J-6, <br /> General Ran Amendment and Rezonings 2-7 ESA/210016 <br /> Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report December 2011 <br />