Laserfiche WebLink
and the 1028 existing units facilitated by existing undeveloped residentially zoned land, these <br /> 2,088 new units will accommodate the 3277 housing units that represent Pleasanton's fair share <br /> of the Regional Housing Need as determined by the Association of Bay Area Governments. <br /> 2. The Project Would Improve the Local Jobs/Housing Balance as a Means of <br /> Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled Associated with GHG Emissions <br /> In 2010, the City of Pleasanton contained 25,962 housing units and <br /> approximately 55,770 jobs resulting in .47 housing units per job. Rezoning to facilitate <br /> approximately 2088 additional housing units would improve that number to .50 housing units per <br /> job. Vehicle miles traveled per day as a result of this additional housing supply proximate to <br /> Pleasanton jobs is estimated to be reduced by approximately 15,700 miles per day, resulting in <br /> a significant reduction of GHG emissions. <br /> 3. The Project Would Enable the City to Comply with the 2010 Settlement <br /> Agreement Concerning the Urban Habitat and General Plan/CEQA <br /> Litigations <br /> Adoption of the Housing Element and its associated General Plan amendments <br /> and rezonings to accommodate the City's fair share of Regional Housing Need are required by <br /> the terms of Section 6 of the 2010 Settlement Agreement between Urban Habit, the State of <br /> California, and the City of Pleasanton. Section 8 of the 2010 Settlement Agreement also <br /> requires the City to adopt a Climate Action Plan by February 17, 2012. Failure to timely comply <br /> with the terms of the agreement could result in the court mandating the suspension of the City's <br /> land use and permitting authority or the approval of various land use actions pursuant to <br /> Government Code section 65755, as occurred previously in the Urban Habitat Litigation where <br /> the court suspended the City's permitting authority over all non-residential building permits. <br /> E. Determination and Adoption of Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> The City Council has weighed the economic, legal, social, technological, and <br /> other benefits of the proposed Project, as set forth above in Section II.D, against the significant <br /> unavoidable impacts of the Project identified in the SEIR (and discussed above in Section II.A). <br /> The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and <br /> adverse environmental impacts of the Project, and further determines that the Project's <br /> significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. <br /> Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, <br /> recognizing that significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Project. <br /> Having (i) adopted all feasible mitigation measures, as stated herein and discussed in the SEIR; <br /> (ii) rejected alternatives to the Project, as stated herein and discussed in the SEIR; and (iii) <br /> recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of the Project, the City Council hereby finds that <br /> each of the separate benefits of the proposed Project, as stated herein, is determined to be unto <br /> itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that warrants approval of the <br /> Project and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts, and thereby justifies <br /> the approval of the Housing Element (and its associated General Plan amendments and <br /> rezonings) and Draft Climate Action Plan. <br />