My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
011712
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2012 1:20:40 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 1:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bob Lemmons, Verona Homeowners Association Board of Directors and across the street from the <br /> Nearon site, said several years ago the site was proposed for residential and 83% of their residents <br /> were opposed primarily because of loss of home values and traffic issues. The site density is now <br /> increased and the parcel small with one entrance. The community center was recently constructed with <br /> an additional 200+ cars on weekends, and he voiced concern that the added density will greatly affect <br /> residents. <br /> Joe McAdams, Verona Homeowners Association Board of Directors, asked the Council to modify Site 9 <br /> Nearon properties' classification from the 30 units per acre to match the Verona density per acre similar <br /> to what is being proposed for Site 7 feathering. The Verona development and Site 9 are very close to <br /> each other and only separated by West Las Positas. At the present time residents have no concept that <br /> the site will house 30 units to the acre. While he understands the time constraint, he asked the Council <br /> to either remove the site from tonight's action or allow more time for residents to make their feelings <br /> known to the Council. <br /> Scott Raty, Chamber of Commerce, congratulated the work of the Housing Task Force, staff, Council <br /> and Planning Commission and in meeting the state and the court's requirements for workforce housing. <br /> With the final number 200+ units above the minimum requirement, they have heard some comments <br /> that this is too many as well as not enough cushion. Given the uncertainty of HCD's final conclusion, <br /> they feel it is safer to err on the side of caution and staff's recommendation to include those extra units <br /> and more importantly, they believe it is important to include a powerful message with the final plan that <br /> will help HCD view the City's work with confidence and ask that they concur with the Planning <br /> Commission's recommendation of December 14`" to recommend that the East Side Specific Plan be <br /> completed and adopted by the second quarter of 2013. In doing this, it will demonstrate to HCD that <br /> Pleasanton has no intention of being put in such a precarious position again, and as a community, they <br /> are committed to the timeline. It will also communicate a message of certainty to all property owners <br /> involved. He concluded stating that Pleasanton remains in charge of its own future and not allowing this <br /> to fall into the hands of the state or the court, and he asked the Council to adopt the December 14th <br /> recommendation. <br /> Stacey Borsody said she served on the Housing Task Force, commended everyone involved and <br /> thanked staff for meeting the court-mandated deadlines. She referred to the cushion proposed and <br /> questioned why would the Council approve a surplus of units, felt there is a risk that sites will be <br /> rejected, and urged the Council to ensure they have a clear understanding of what this risk is. HCD <br /> submitted their letter with issues on some sites which staff adequately addressed, but she questioned <br /> real impacts on the community for some sites. She also felt extra time was needed to plan for increased <br /> growth and surplus and its impact on schools. <br /> Pat Costanzo stated he is representing the Kiewit property, thanked everybody for the collaborative <br /> process, and said he thinks the outcome has been good except for the fact that their site was removed. <br /> He presented on December 6 as to why they believe their site should be rezoned, given ratings and <br /> distribution of density. He believes the site is under-allocated its fair share of high density, and the east <br /> side existing plus proposed is only 9.6% of all high density in town. Therefore, they feel strongly that the <br /> Kiewit site be rezoned and while they know the Council will most likely not approve this, he asked for <br /> the Council's support in moving forward the Specific Plan on the timeline submitted to HCD. They are <br /> prepared to commit resources to make this happen to create a great plan. <br /> Mayor Hosterman said the community will go through the process of studying the east side in a <br /> comprehensive manner according to a timeline adopted by the Council. <br /> Valerie Arkin recommended against 100% affordable housing in any certain development and asked <br /> that it be dispersed throughout a development and intermingled which is the City's current practice. She <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 13 January 4,2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.