Laserfiche WebLink
side and substandard lot depth prevents the applicant from locating the required parking space <br /> in a side yard and outside of the front yard setback. The lot depth and strict application of the <br /> provisions of this chapter prevent the applicant from maintaining the 23-foot front yard setback <br /> and locating a non-tandem parking space outside of the front yard setback and, therefore, <br /> would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under <br /> identical zoning classification. Therefore, staff believes this finding can be made. <br /> 2. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent <br /> with the limitation on other properties classified in the same zoning district; <br /> Staff analysis: In order for this finding to be made, there must be a relationship between the <br /> unique site and the variance in question. As stated above, staff believes that the property is <br /> unique in that there is an incline of the lot on the east side and it is substandard in lot depth, <br /> and if the lot depth met the minimum R-1-6,500 District standards and the lot were level, the <br /> parking Variances would not be needed. Variance requests for setbacks have been approved <br /> throughout the City, and Downtown, for other properties in the same zoning district (i.e., 4512 <br /> (the adjacent property), 4558, and 4698 Second Street, 4575 Augustine Street, and 4070 <br /> Stanley Boulevard). Therefore, staff believes that the Planning Commission would not be <br /> granting a special privilege to the property owner that is inconsistent with other Variance <br /> approvals. <br /> 3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or <br /> welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (Ord. 1520 § 5, <br /> 1991;prior code § 2-11.29(1)) <br /> Staff analysis: The front yard setback for dwellings is designed in insure the public's safety <br /> and general welfare by providing adequate visibility for safe traffic maneuvers and to preserve <br /> the aesthetic character of the residential neighborhood. The 20-foot front yard setback of the <br /> house would not pose a traffic sight obstruction due to the lot's approximately 110-foot <br /> distance from the nearest street corner and the additional 14-foot setback from the street <br /> provided by the sidewalk and planter areas along the frontage of the lot. Also, the front <br /> setback of the house would be compatible with the setbacks of other homes in the area, many <br /> of which are less than 23-feet. Additionally, a house of appropriate size would not appear <br /> overbearing as viewed from the street due to the additional 14-foot setback provided by the <br /> sidewalk and planter areas. Also, even if the building were to meet the 23-foot setback, the <br /> front porch would still be 12-feet from the front property line and, therefore, the building wall <br /> would not create safety issues. Furthermore, the tandem parking in the front yard would not <br /> extend into the public right-of-way (i.e. sidewalk). The proposed reduced setback and tandem <br /> parking are common for properties located in Downtown. Therefore, staff believes this finding <br /> can be made. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> The construction of the new home and variance requests are categorically exempt from <br /> environmental review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, <br /> Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, Class 3 and Section <br /> P11-0709/P11-0717, 205 Neal Street Planning Commission <br /> 17 of 18 <br />