Laserfiche WebLink
_ Fi. ure8: Nei.hborin. FARs <br /> F~M 4.000 _'onin4 , / y <br /> v/;i5firict ff �? / <br /> /?s ^o 6Q?c / <br /> vsS) yy y'v <br /> 9 <br /> yso VA, NO / / `�9.03�° <br /> 9s. . SQVd / r, <br /> A9 S <br /> vs� / is <br /> ^O / ws 39?35% j0� <br /> 0 2y 7 <br /> 1§g / VSO 30';fl� 1.2 . <br /> / G <br /> v5„ .40% <br /> / 'd / 34% <br /> 6� / BND vs ti <br /> S / v <br /> / '1> 15°/) <br /> EL <br /> 767y .�;�Yn -, �S <br /> y�'u'6• rL'�rs ? y,,SS <br /> vs�2 vc 9 O �J0 <br /> // <br /> A 57(5-) O n ri <br /> Staff notes that the FARs shown in Figure 8 calculated from City records/building plans. With <br /> the exception of 221 Neal Street, 4512 Second Street, and 4546 Second Street, the records <br /> did not indicate if accessory structures were/are located onsite. <br /> Zoning Ordinance <br /> Design Review Criteria <br /> The Planning Commission shall review site plans, landscaping plans, building architecture and <br /> such other plans and reports (grading plans, EIR/negative declarations, etc.) as may be <br /> required to preserve and enhance the city's aesthetic values and ensure the preservation of <br /> the public health, safety and general welfare. Per Chapter 18.20 of the Pleasanton Municipal <br /> Code, projects are evaluated by the following design criteria: <br /> 1. Preservation of the natural beauty of the City and the project site's relationship to it. <br /> Staff analysis: The proposed project is a new two-story residence that is generally consistent <br /> with the architectural style and detailing found in other homes in the Downtown area and, <br /> therefore, would not negatively affect the natural beauty of the city. <br /> P11-0709/P11-0717, 205 Neal Street <br /> Planning Commission <br /> 11 of 18 <br />