My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
011712
>
06 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2012 12:02:15 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 12:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
times of the day that illustrate the existing shadows on adjacent properties (please refer to <br /> Exhibit D). An artist rendering of the streetscape view has been included with Exhibit B for the <br /> Commission's consideration. <br /> During the meeting, the Bourgs, adjacent property owners, spoke in opposition to the project <br /> stating their concerns with massing and requested Variances. The Bourg's also stated <br /> concerns regarding the effect the development will have on their oak tree. The applicant has <br /> submitted a tree report prepared by an arborist regarding the proposed construction and the <br /> effects, if any, it may have on the oak tree. The arborist concluded that there will be little or no <br /> impact to the health of the oak tree. The arborist report is included as Exhibit E for the <br /> Commission's consideration. Furthermore, at the request of the applicant, the City's <br /> Landscape Architect, Mike Fulford, conducted a site visit to also assess the tree and what <br /> impacts the proposal would have on the tree, if any. Mr. Fulford concluded that because a <br /> structure (4512 Second Street) had already been built within the drip-line of the tree, and since <br /> the location of the new structure is proposed outside of the trees canopy, it is highly unlikely <br /> that there are any roots that would be affected by the new construction. <br /> Two additional residents spoke in opposition of the project and five spoke in support (excluding <br /> the property owners and their architect). Public comments and additional comments made by <br /> the Commission are in the attached meeting minutes in Exhibit F. <br /> SITE DESCRIPTION <br /> The subject site is a Downtown residential interior lot located on the south side of Neal Street. <br /> The site is approximately 9,428 square-feet in area and gradually inclines as it progresses east <br /> towards Third Street. The properties located south and west of the subject site contain two- <br /> story residences and the site east of 215 Neal Street, currently under construction, will be a <br /> two-story residence. There is a retaining wall that bisects the property with one two-story <br /> residence (215 Neal Street) located on the east side of the retaining wall and one single-story <br /> residence (205 Neal Street, the subject dwelling) located on the west side of the retaining wall. <br /> Staff notes that neither home (205 or 215 Neal Street) is considered a second dwelling unit <br /> (Please refer to Figure 1 on page 4). Similar to other properties Downtown, the two dwellings <br /> that exist on the subject property are pre-existing non-conforming in that there are two pre- <br /> existing units on one lot zoned R-1-6,500. Therefore, neither house is subject to the Zoning <br /> Ordinance provisions for second units; new construction would follow the site development <br /> standards of the R-1-6,500 District for a main dwelling unit. <br /> Please refer to the next page for Figure 1 <br /> P11-0709/P11-0717, 205 Neal Street <br /> Planning Commission <br /> 3 gf18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.