My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
011712
>
06 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2012 12:02:15 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 12:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Olson inquired how FAR relates to mass and whether it more truly <br /> relates to footprint. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it relates to total floor area. <br /> Commissioner Pentin noted that front yard setback was originally 23 feet and now it is <br /> 20 feet. He inquired where 23 feet came from and if it was it established as such for <br /> many years or if this is something the City just wants to do in order to push the house <br /> farther back from the street. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that he did not know the evolution or history behind this change and <br /> he referred the question to Steve Otto. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that the Municipal Code had a 20-foot front yard setback in the 1960's, <br /> and he understands that given cars were getting larger, the City bumped the setback an <br /> additional three feet in order to handle these larger vehicles. <br /> Commissioner Pentin noted that side yard separations have also been reduced from ten <br /> feet to eight feet and asked Mr. Otto if this is something that was also set in the past. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that he does not recall the actual evolution or thought behind setting <br /> 10 feet between two one-story homes and 17 feet between one-story and two-story <br /> homes. <br /> Commissioner Pentin questioned the significance of a variance and inquired if three feet <br /> or two feet are really big variances or if a variance should not really be done for five <br /> inches. <br /> Mr. Dolan explained that the findings for variances are difficult to make, and they are <br /> based upon some certain limitations such as some special circumstance of the property <br /> which is not necessarily man-made. He stated that the lot for this proposed project is <br /> big, and the limitations of what is left over on one side of the property is a man-made <br /> condition. He noted that some people refer to this property as two lots, and the <br /> applicants are trying to place a medium-sized house on a very small lot, when in reality, <br /> the applicants are expanding a second home to be a medium-sized home on an existing <br /> lot that already has another medium-sized home. He added that what is being <br /> considered a tiny width is actually a wide width, and the current home makes what is left <br /> on the one side look pretty narrow. <br /> Commissioner Pentin referred to the letter from Peter MacDonald which talks of <br /> street-oriented design. He asked Mr. Dolan if that would put the house closer to the <br /> street with a porch in front, and if this is something that is not uncommon in the area. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that there is a trend in PUD developments where houses are creeping <br /> up closer to the street to increase walkability, and porches are being created to promote <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, APRIL 13, 2011 Page 8 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.