My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
011712
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2012 11:37:51 AM
Creation date
1/13/2012 11:37:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF 06 <br /> ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT V <br /> pL£ASANTON. <br /> January 17, 2012 <br /> Community Development <br /> Planning Division <br /> TITLE: P11-0709/P11-0717, CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A DESIGN REVIEW <br /> APPLICATION TO REPLACE THE APPROXIMATELY <br /> 482-SQUARE-FOOT, SINGLE-STORY HOUSE LOCATED AT 205 NEAL <br /> STREET WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 1,844-SQUARE-FOOT <br /> TWO-STORY RESIDENCE AND FOR VARIANCES FROM THE <br /> PLEASANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO: (1) REDUCE THE FRONT <br /> YARD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 23 FEET TO 20 FEET TO <br /> ACCOMMODATE THE NEW HOUSE; (2) ALLOW ONE REQUIRED <br /> OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE TO BE LOCATED IN THE REQUIRED <br /> FRONT YARD SETBACK; AND (3) ALLOW TANDEM PARKING <br /> APPELLANTS: Brian and Christine Bourg <br /> APPLICANTS/ <br /> PROPERTY OWNERS: Dave and Francine Cunningham <br /> SUMMARY <br /> Brian and Christine Bourg are appealing the Planning Commission's approval to allow <br /> the replacement of the 482-square-foot, single-story house with an approximately <br /> 1,844 square-foot, two-story residence that requires three Variances from the <br /> Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC). The Bourg's believe that the proposal violates the <br /> Downtown Specific Plan and Downtown Design Guidelines. As stated in the Bourgs' <br /> letter of appeal, they believe the proposal: (1) is out of scale with the site because it <br /> requires three Variances; (2) doesn't fit with the character of the "historic neighborhood"; <br /> (3) is a detriment to the neighborhood because it has the appearance of a condominium <br /> or townhouse due to its scale and massing; and (4) would set a "very bad" precedent for <br /> the demolition of other small collages in the downtown area. The Bourgs' explanation <br /> of appeal is provided in Attachment 2. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> Approved the application subject to the conditions of approval in Attachment 1 by a <br /> 4-1 vote. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft resolution denying the <br /> appeal, thereby upholding the Planning Commission's approval of P11-0709 and <br /> P11-0717 subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.