Laserfiche WebLink
The Planning Commission meeting minutes can be found in Attachment 6 and the staff <br /> report can be found in Attachment 7 for the Council's consideration. <br /> On December 27, 2011, Mr. Pretzel filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's <br /> decision (Attachment 2). <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The side fencing is located on the common property lines, but the rear fencing was built <br /> within the boundaries of Mr. Deike's property and costs for the rear yard fence were not <br /> shared with the rear yard neighbor (Mr. Pretzel). <br /> The new rear yard fencing spans the full width of Mr. Deike's property, but because Mr. <br /> Deike's rear property line is not as long as Mr. Pretzel's rear property line, there is a <br /> section of Mr. Pretzel's rear yard fencing (see Photo 1) that is joint fencing between <br /> himself and Ms. Fink (located at 3656 Carlsbad Way, the northern neighbor of Mr. <br /> Deike). The section of fencing that was not replaced is approximately six-inches lower <br /> than the new fence installed by Mr. Deike. <br /> V <br /> :;'= — Mr.Deike's new <br /> fencing <br /> Ms.Fink's Section <br /> Mr. Deike's Section <br /> Photo 1: View of subject fencing and the existing fencing <br /> from Mr. Pretzel's rear yard <br /> • ' <br /> w• ` <br /> Fencing not being replaced <br /> 466 •' Fencing located on the <br /> y!I if common property line <br /> • M <br /> 4, <br /> 6 I, 01 , • .. • <br /> . 8 <br /> a <br /> Fencing not on a ! A`11"-m's ' rs <br /> common property line <br /> Figure 2: Property Line Offset and fentifng <br /> locations <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />