My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
010412
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2011 11:47:23 AM
Creation date
12/28/2011 11:47:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
previous EIR adequately apply to the project as modified. Accordingly, the SEIR need <br /> contain only the analysis necessary to respond to the proposed change in the project <br /> that triggered the need for additional environmental review. <br /> SEIR Description: An SEIR is an informational document, the purpose of which is to <br /> make the public and decision-makers aware of the environmental consequences of a <br /> project. It is also intended for use by responsible agencies in considering any actions <br /> they must take or permits they must issue as a result of implementation of the Housing <br /> Element and Climate Action Plan. Together the DSEIR and the FSEIR compose the <br /> entire SEIR document for the project. Staff is recommending adoption of these <br /> documents. <br /> As is common with General Plans and Housing Elements, the SEIR identifies potential <br /> environmental impacts and mitigation measures. Analysis of the impacts of the <br /> proposed project indicated potential significant impacts on Aesthetics, Air Quality, <br /> Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, <br /> Public Services and Utilities (Water), and Transportation. The impacts requiring <br /> mitigation were all ascribed to impacts of the Housing Element, and specifically to <br /> residential development that would be allowed with the potential rezoning of sites. Most <br /> of these impacts would be reduced to a less than significant impact with the application <br /> of the mitigation measures described in the SEIR. The mitigation measures are <br /> generally typical of measures applied to development in Pleasanton, such as: dust <br /> control during construction: pre-construction surveys to avoid impacts on birds, bats or <br /> burrowing owls; protection of creeks and riparian vegetation; archaeological monitoring <br /> for archaeologically sensitive sites; Phase 1 environmental assessments required to <br /> assess any hazardous materials on sites; a limitation on the hours of construction; <br /> vibration and acoustical studies to determine appropriate construction techniques and <br /> sound mitigation for new buildings; and payment of impact fees. <br /> The following paragraphs describe the two significant and unavoidable impacts which <br /> are identified in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report: <br /> Impact 4.D-1: Development facilitated by the General Plan Amendment and <br /> rezoning has the potential to adversely change the significance of historic <br /> resources. <br /> Construction activities such as grading and excavation associated with <br /> development on the potential sites for rezoning identified in the proposed <br /> Housing Element could potentially affect known historic or cultural resources. <br /> Specifically, Site 6 (Irby-Kaplan-Zia) and Site 21 (4202 Stanley) include various <br /> early 20th century buildings that may be historic. These resources could be <br /> directly adversely impacted by development if they are demolished to make way <br /> for new housing. Mitigation measures 4.D-la and 4.D-1b include the <br /> requirement for a historic evaluation at Sites 6 and 21. These evaluations may <br /> determine that these buildings are not eligible for consideration as historic <br /> resources. However, if one or more of these buildings is determined to have <br /> historic significance, demolition would remain significant and unavoidable even <br /> with implementation of mitigation requiring documentation of the resource. <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.