CCMIN090611 - Laserfiche WebLink

windows as outlined in this list with a much smaller noise wall in the rear, the General Plan requirements can be met for the interior and exterior noise levels. Councilmember McGovern asked if noise levels were allowed to go up to 75 dBA in bedrooms. Mr. Dolan said the question was asked by Councilmember Sullivan in the past about what people will be subjected to during the period of time when the whistle blows. Staff provided this information in the staff report and in the study, as well as in a subsequent memo. It rises to 74 dBA for a brief moment during the duration of the whistle blowing. Councilmember Sullivan referred to the table on page 8 of the staff report and asked that it be displayed after the presentation. Mr. Dolan said staff continues to support the project. He believes the changes proposed improve the project and it is consistent with the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan land use designations and policies. In terms of the land use designation, both documents call for high density development which is consistent with policies to provide smart growth, walk able communities, residential near services, and more residential near the downtown to add to the health of the downtown which would provide residents' ability to use more services there. He said Old Stanley is a unique and eclectic street and it is hard to be consistent with a major theme. For the downtown, the project blends overall with its general character in terms of the size of the homes proposed and the traditional design of homes on Old Stanley. The homes are unique in their square footages, which attract and serve a certain market not often served. Councilmember Thorne questioned if Mr. Dolan compared the development with the development next door in terms of size, height and other things. Mr. Dolan said he believes they are smaller and do compare in height. Mayor Hosterman pointed out that for that side of the street, the designation in the General Plan is for that use type, whereas, it is very different from the single family homes of various sizes on the other side of the street. Mr. Dolan agreed. Lastly, Mr. Dolan said another reason staff is supportive of the project is because, as conditioned, staff feels it has addressed most of the impacts to the adjacent residents. While obviously it takes out the trees and does not preserve the old home, it does do a good job in addressing the potential for parking problems, and changes made are reasonable to the photovoltaic system. Mayor Hosterman cited the Town's urban forest and said she did not like to lose trees; however, she likes the trade-off better than the last time the project was presented. She asked Mr. Fulford what the trade-off was in value of what is lost and gained in terms of new plantings. Mr. Fulford said a good part of this is subjective but the major trees are about the same age as the house and right on the street. They have a tremendous visual impact. It is likely they were damaged badly 40-50 years ago by topping and since then have not been structurally sound. There have been very recent and historic catastrophic branch failures. While the trees may be candidates for preservation, they will always be hazardous, and in his opinion, are not valuable long-term candidates for preservation. He thinks the community would be better served by planting more new trees with this development and said it would not take long to forest an area. Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio said she has a fruitless Mulberry trees in her neighborhood which were recommended by a tree expert and not the best choice. Many people top them and they look horrible. She asked whether the HOA can condition homeowner upkeep for trees. Mr. Fulford said they are not proposing any fruitless Mulberry trees, and the project trees could be conditioned much the same way people are required to appropriately prune and maintain heritage trees. City Council Minutes Page 7 of 16 September 6, 2011