Laserfiche WebLink
thumb is that the net present value savings needs to exceed 3% and if it does, refinancing should <br /> be taken advantage of. <br /> The LAVWMA Board will meet later this month and will consider adopting a resolution that <br /> proposes that refinancing will be predicated on a net present value savings of at least 6%. If <br /> savings exceed 6%, refinancing will move forward per authorization from the Board, and the <br /> lowest bid will be accepted. The LAVWMA Board's plan is to issue the bonds on or about October <br /> 8th with the same maturity as the 2001 bonds, which is in 2031. There will be no extension of debt <br /> and the reserve fund of $9 million will be used to reduce the amount of the 2011 bonds to be <br /> issued. Therefore, there will be no reserve fund for the new bonds. <br /> Ms. Wagner said staff met with Councilmembers Thorne and McGovern to review the refinancing <br /> savings and bond document agreements, certificate and resolution proposed for adoption, and <br /> approved moving the item forward for City Council approval. She briefly described the Amended <br /> and Restated Sewer Service Contract which amends the March 1, 2001 contract with minimal <br /> changes, the Preliminary Official Statement which is the public offering statement for the sale of <br /> the bonds and which describes all aspects of the bond issue as well as the economic, financial <br /> and social characteristics of LAVWMA and member agencies, and the Continuing Disclosure <br /> Certificate which satisfies the SEC's rules regarding annual disclosure to the secondary market on <br /> information regarding the City's sewer system. <br /> Staff is recommending the Council adopt the resolution authorizing the approval of the Amended <br /> and Restated Sewer Service Contract, approval of those sections of the Preliminary Official <br /> Statement that describe the City and approval of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate, and <br /> authorize the City Manager to sign the documents on behalf of the City. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan referred his question regarding the ability of LAVWMA to issue new <br /> bonds in addition to this without receiving member agency approval. He noted that the Executive <br /> Director and staff both responded that the LAVWMA Board could not issue new bonds that <br /> affected Pleasanton Council without also agreeing. Ms. Wagner stated that there is language <br /> regarding the issuance of parity debt because the bondholders must be notified that the collateral <br /> for their bonds could also be the collateral of future bonds. By doing so would preclude being able <br /> to issue anything for 20 years. She said normally the recommendation by advisors is to keep <br /> options open. The bond investors must be notified, and this does not necessarily mean bonds are <br /> being issued, but in the case of LAVWMA, any new bonds would require all six members <br /> unanimously approving it, including the Pleasanton City Council. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan noted that the two export pipelines are the limit on growth in the valley. <br /> Once capacity is reached, there is nowhere else to put sewage. He questioned whether <br /> increasing the amount of discharge through that system requires a vote of the individual <br /> jurisdiction as well as the LAVWMA Board. Ms. Wagner said in 2001, Pleasanton felt very strongly <br /> that in order for their two members to vote affirmatively to move forward with the expansion <br /> project, it required voter approval, and other jurisdictions did not elect to do this. They authorized <br /> through their Councils that their members vote affirmatively for the expansion project. <br /> Mr. Fialho clarified with Councilmember Sullivan that the Council would have the ability to reaffirm <br /> or put this to the voters through a ballot measure in the future if there were any proposal to <br /> expand the capacity. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan said when working on the Housing Element Update, the Council also <br /> discussed preparing an update to its Growth Management policies. He felt this issue should be <br /> part of that discussion and asked for its status. Mr. Fialho said the City knows what the <br /> consumption or export per day is and what it is projected to be in the next few years, and the City <br /> is well below its share of the LAVWMA capacity. He said Councilmembers Thorne and McGovern <br /> City Council Minutes Page 13 of 16 September 6, 2011 <br />