My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN081611
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
CCMIN081611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2011 3:29:55 PM
Creation date
10/4/2011 3:29:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN081611
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is an expectation that this will go to 4.7%. The 9%, if paid, has an additional cost of 3% of pay. So, even <br /> though the 24.1% is in the CaIPERS valuation, the total contribution as a percentage of base pay is <br /> 36.1% of pay. <br /> Mr. Bartel outlined 4 potential scenarios for Council consideration: 1) Establish a second tier and the City <br /> will continue to pay 9% member contribution and will save 4.4% of tier 2 payroll; 2) The City pays the <br /> member contributions but gradually phases out the payment of the 9% as the City's contribution rate is <br /> going up for both tier 1 and tier 2; 3) Phase-out of the 9% for tier 1, but no member contribution being <br /> paid by the City for tier 2, which results in an immediate savings in tier 2; and 4)What would happen if the <br /> City did not pay immediately any of the member contribution. <br /> He noted that if the City is thinking of putting in a second tier only and is doing it for budget reasons to <br /> save money, the City will not save much and will not save noticeably for some amount of time. <br /> City Manager Fialho thanked Mr. Bartel who he said has 30 years of actuarial services. He has been an <br /> impartial contributor to a number of pension discussions. Regarding the policy aspects of the discussion, <br /> Mr. Fialho stated the Council adopted a new Work Plan for the coming two fiscal years. One element of <br /> the plan calls for fiscal policies and reform strategies to address the City's unfunded liabilities. Much of <br /> the information is on the City's website and it has been distributed with the staff report. <br /> He referred to the League of California Cities Pension Reform Action Plan which was approved <br /> unanimously by the League Board of Directors in July 2011. It was designed as a strategic goal related to <br /> pension reform for local governments and what the State can do legislatively and through policy <br /> discussions. The document identifies what can be done locally through the collective bargaining process <br /> and what needs to be happening at the state level and what local government can do to help shape those <br /> policy discussions. <br /> Mr. Fialho said the endorsement of this policy would be consistent with the Council's policy objective of <br /> identifying short and long term reform initiatives for pensions locally and statewide. If endorsed, the <br /> Council can also consider benchmarks for measuring its progress over a specified period of time. The <br /> staff report suggests annual 5 year benchmarks. Staff has identified 3 benchmarks which include 1) <br /> eliminating negative amortization, or principal and interest payments, and adjusting contributions so the <br /> City is making progress in getting ahead of the costs associated with employer rates; 2) reducing the <br /> City's unfunded liabilities by a minimum of 10%; and 3) reducing personnel related cost as a percentage <br /> of payroll to about 70% of the operating budget. It is currently at 78% and was at 79%. Historically from <br /> 1995, the City has averaged in the 72% range. <br /> Mr. Fialho suggested the public read the League's Pension Paper and noted costs can be contained by <br /> having employees assume the full share of the Employer Paid Member Contribution, implement lower <br /> tiers for new hires, and require that final retirement allowances for retirees be based on more than just <br /> one year. The second step calls for the State to restore some fiscal sustainability through policy and <br /> legislative efforts. Some examples in the document on how to accomplish this is by repealing SB 400 and <br /> AB 616 which gave rise to the enhanced benefit formulas; prohibit enhanced formulas for 20 years; <br /> eliminate the availability of City-paid/employer-paid member contributions statewide; and provide <br /> employers with another option of a combination of a 401K style deferred contribution plan with a lower <br /> risk management defined benefit plan. He said the adoption of this document, along with the benchmarks <br /> would be in compliance with the work plan. It could serve as a framework and provide useful benchmarks <br /> to evaluate progress. The Council could adopt the document with some local amendments, hold it over <br /> for two weeks, do nothing, receive public input, and wait for the outcome of negotiations with the Police <br /> Officers Association. <br /> At the request of Mayor Hosterman, Mr. Fialho and Mr. Bartel expanded on the three benchmarks: <br /> 1. Eliminate negative amortization — Mr. Bartel said currently, the City's amortization periods are <br /> longer than 20 years. For CaIPERS' calculations, if the City gets to an amortization period shorter <br /> than 20 years, it eliminates negative amortization. Like a home mortgage, the shorter the <br /> amortization period, the higher the payment is. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 18 August 16,2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.