My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN071911
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
CCMIN071911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2011 3:28:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2011 3:28:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN071911
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance (IZO) which staff will consider as part of Program 16.1. There were suggestions <br /> regarding undertaking a review of how the City spends its lower income housing fee, which is a <br /> requirement of Program 17.1. Staff suggests that the Citizens for a Caring Community remarks <br /> be considered part of this. There were also suggestions regarding undertaking a review of the <br /> condominium conversion ordinance, and staff can take some suggestions from this letter into <br /> consideration. <br /> A letter was also received from the East Bay Housing Organization (EBHO), which is an <br /> umbrella organization of affordable housing developers. The basics of their letter point to the <br /> City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO) and commend it, but also point out that they believe <br /> that the IZO is not a loan sufficient to meet the City's affordable housing need. They asked the <br /> City to look at master planning larger development areas and identifying joint development <br /> opportunity sites. Staff worked with them and proposed Program 14.5, whereby the City would <br /> work with the east Pleasanton specific plan property owners to secure a site for development of <br /> family housing by a non-profit housing developer. EBHO further asked for additional incentives <br /> for affordable housing to capture some of what they see as a windfall value because of the <br /> additional value potentially conveyed with the rezoning to residential. <br /> Mayor Hosterman noted that while the City Council is happy to work with EBHO to secure a site, <br /> she suggested also ensuring that the City not make any changes prior to completing the East <br /> Pleasanton study. Mr. Dolan noted that it was envisioned that this dialogue would occur during <br /> preparation of the specific plan. Ms. Stern stated that as part of the settlement agreement, the <br /> City said it would help to score the potential sites on particular criteria, called TECAC criteria, <br /> which is related to funds which affordable housing developers can claim if they score highly on <br /> criteria. Criteria is different than what the Housing Element Task Force uses in that they focus <br /> more on the distance to transit, parks, library, grocery stores, senior center, medical clinics <br /> whereas the Housing Element Task Force criteria were broader and brought in elements of <br /> environment, noise, and traffic. This analysis was completed and staff met with some affordable <br /> housing developers to discuss the results which are available on the City's website. <br /> Ms. Stern then presented a table illustrating the calculated need of approximately 2,000 units or <br /> 69 acres, stating that it compares it to the Housing Element Task Force recommendations which <br /> were in Attachment 7 that total about 3,000 units and the Planning Commission <br /> recommendations totaling about 3,200 units. <br /> Mr. Dolan concluded the presentation, stating the recommendation the Planning Commission <br /> made relative to the Auf de Maur/Richenback site, which was to increase the amount that would <br /> be zoned at 30 units per acre, occurred after all of the public workshops. The meeting <br /> sponsored by the owner was at the request of the Planning Commission. He said he also <br /> wanted to be sure that the dialogue of the Planning Commission on the issue was clear to the <br /> Council. He did not think the Planning Commission concluded that this would be their <br /> recommendation, but they knew it was a possibility and part of the dialogue. They felt it was <br /> prudent to include the larger number in the preliminary discussion that the City sends to HCD for <br /> feedback rather than a smaller number and not have any feedback on that possibility. In terms <br /> of next steps, Mr. Dolan stated staff will take any changes as directed by the City Council. There <br /> are a few data gaps which staff must fill in prior to submitting to HCD on August 16th, but they <br /> will meet the deadline. HCD will have 60 days to review it and at that time, the Council will have <br /> a draft EIR to review and be well on its way to reviewing the final EIR. He said the settlement <br /> agreement commits the City to the adoption of the Housing Element within 90 days of receiving <br /> HCD's comments, and this will put them at mid-January 2012. He reiterated that when <br /> submitted, staff will ensure that HCD understands it is not the City's intention to rezone all 105 <br /> acres, but rather closer to the 69 acres. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 14 July 19,2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.