Laserfiche WebLink
neither do the colors and the red banner on the ExtraMile sign. He indicated that this is <br />, <br />what is being proposed is definitely not that look. He expressed concern that, even <br />though staff has tried to mitigate this, something is being lost. He added that he was <br />also not in support of raising the sign height. <br /> <br />d with Commissioner Blank with regard to <br />its bright yellow color. He stated that he thinks the front cover of the project shows <br />more of a brighter yellow and agreed that it does not work with the neighborhood look. <br />He noted that there are not too many bright colors like that in the City, except one or two <br />on First Street, which do not match the neighborhood. He indicated that on the <br />contrary, he believes these two colors proposed are Pleasanton-looking and match the <br />neighborhood, although he is not thrilled with the chilled wine color. He added that <br />while he has no problem with the proposed colors, he can agree with the neighbors that <br />having the dark color on three sides of building is problematic; however, if the sides of <br />the building all looked like the front of the building, it would be fine. He indicated that he <br />also does not support raising the height of the signs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson stated that he is not a big fan of yellow on buildings and he found <br />the proposed colors to be a vast improvement. He indicated that he agreed with <br /> the Commission should deal with the two <br />ends of the building and the east elevation, make some changes there, and stay with <br />the two proposed colors. He added that he also does not support raising the height of <br />the two signs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that <br />then was given a picture of what the Commission was supposed to believe, which he <br />cannot agree with. He indicated that he passes the building every day and rides his <br />bike by it, and the color on the three sides does not work for him. He added that if the <br />two main colors of nutmeg and café-au-lait were to be approved, he agrees with staff <br />that they need to be muted. He noted that this has already happened on this property, <br />and the history of what has previously been done in order for this property to exist <br />should be adhered to. He added that he does not support raising the height of signs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she is usually happy to let companies utilize their <br />colors as they would like to, but she agrees with what has been said that given the <br />history of this project, she is inclined to respect decisions of the previous Planning <br />Commission, especially since there has been quite a bit of discussion about this. She <br />colors are lovely on the paint <br />chip, but look very dark on the renderings; t <br />recommendation to stay with those color families because they are lovely, but to lighten <br />them up. She noted that her inclination when looking at the renderings provided is that <br />there is an awful lot of those colors on a large part of the building. She added that she <br />is never inclined to mess around with color schemes, elevations, or anything else at the <br />last minute because she is not a colorist or an architect. She stated that she likes those <br />colors but would like to see them muted. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 10, 2011 Page 10 of 15 <br /> <br />