Laserfiche WebLink
facility when she needed a wheelchair to move around. She indicated that this was a <br />difficult decision for her because she comes from a family that typically takes care of <br />family members at home. She noted that she was very fortunate and blessed to get <br />referenced by a nurse to this facility and that this is the best thing that could have <br />happened for her mother. She added that she was able to visit every day because of its <br />proximity, and she believes the activities and interaction provided by the facility gave <br />her mother a longer life that if she stayed at home. <br /> <br />Ms. Cargill stated that in terms of parking, the only time she experienced difficulty was <br />during Friday Night Concerts or First Wednesdays, when people would use the excess <br />parking at the facility. She indicated that she supported any future application for <br />additional beds and requested the Commission to seriously consider it, noting that the <br />City seriously needs this type of facility as the community is growing. She asked the <br />Commission to approve the application for retaining the current beds and parking <br />improvement as this is needed by the community. <br /> <br />Charles Huff stated that he lives near the facility and that when he came to the meeting <br />this evening as a resident, he was not sure if he is in favor of or opposed to the request. <br />He added that if more people from the area spoke about traffic and parking, he would <br />have taken their side. He noted that as an architect, he is sometimes held to a different <br />standard for residential projects on Neal Street, as opposed to larger facilities like this <br />one, especially when he talks about tandem parking. <br /> <br />Mr. Huff stated that he knows the site well as his father lived at the facility and passed <br />away about eight years ago. He also questioned the traffic report, and on the basis of <br />people living closer to the site, he indicated that he would probably not have a traffic <br />concern with the project itself. He noted that he is neutral with respect to his position on <br />the request. <br /> <br />Mr. Olds stated that he feels really good. He indicated that they work hard to make a <br />difference, and everybody is here to make a difference, whether it be the community or <br />the residents in the facility. He reiterated that they are fully committed to what they <br />agreed on with respect to the sign, the fence, and the front area. He added that they <br />will work as fast as they can to make the parking reconfiguration a reality. He noted that <br />the sign is ready to move on, and a contractor needs to be chosen for the fence. He <br />further noted that the parking lot will be done in phases so the parking lot can remain <br />open; hence, their request for an extension of time so they do not miss their deadline. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson asked Mr. Olds if the facility is at full capacity with 139 beds or if <br />they can add more beds to the facility, and if so, how many. <br /> <br />Mr. Olds replied that the facility can accommodate up to 163 beds. He stated, however, <br />that at this time, there are no plans to do that and that their first priority is to maintain <br />what they currently have and to serve the community as they are. He indicated that <br />they have had a problem with turning people away because they are up to full capacity, <br />and this has been happening on a more frequent basis. He noted that they usually <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2011 Page 18 of 21 <br /> <br />