My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071311
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 071311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
10/3/2011 3:41:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
appropriate site for affordable-by-design homes that are within walking distance to the <br />Downtown. <br /> <br />Chair Narum agreed with and stated that she thinks <br />this is not where the battle to saving houses is, that it is more to the south. She <br />indicated that she wished more trees could be saved and that she supports the motion. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />RECUSED: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Resolutions Nos. PC-2011-20 recommending approval of the rezoning and PC-2011-21 <br />recommending approval of the Development Plan were entered and adopted as <br />motioned. <br /> <br />Chair Narum requested Mr. Dolan to respond to Ms. Cruzan's question regarding the <br />role of the workshop. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan explained that typically, there is a workshop at which the Commission <br />expresses its concerns about the project, and the applicant listens and explores with his <br />team to what extent they can respond to those concerns. He continued that when the <br />applicant comes back with an application, the Commission will decide on whether or not <br />the project merits its support. He indicated that this sometimes depends heavily on how <br />responsive the applicant was to the Commission's comments and sometimes it does <br />not. He noted that in this case, the sequence of events was unusual in that it went to <br />the City Council and was recycled back to the Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank commented that the reality is that the Commissioners do a great <br />job but what they say does not matter because the final arbiter is the Council. He <br />indicated that the Commission has seen this before where the developers paid little <br />attention to suggestions, goes to the City Council, and then comes <br />back with suddenly with changes, and the Commission gets to see it again. <br /> <br />Chair Narum clarified that workshops are informative and not binding, and that no vote <br />is taken. <br /> <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2011 Page 12 of 21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.