Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />I~£SOLUTION NO.~ '~' ? ~ <br /> <br /> [~!EREAS, Th? City Council of the C~ty of Plo;'sanron <br /> reviewed the proposal by Oakl~nd-Al~ed~ County Cold,cum, ~nc~ <br /> to construct a coliseum comp~ex ~n t~,e ,,~cin~tv o~ th- Oa~]and <br /> Intern~t~onzl A~rport; and <br /> <br /> ~EREAS, this proposal ~s based upon a ]ease-purcbas~ <br /> <br />ment wbJcb ~nvolve~ the Couotv of alameda ~s ~ party to <br />agreement ~ <br /> <br /> NOW, ~EREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED t~at the C~ty Council <br /> <br />C~ty of Pleasanton, wb~le agreeing in principle with tb~ <br />pressed need for an East-B~y sperts center~ strongly ~eels that <br />use o~ the lease-purchase technique of ~Jnanc~ng the propo~e~ <br />Coliseum Com~le:~ i~ ncr justified ~p tk~s ~n~tanc~. ~ec,~us~ t~e <br />public health and safety ~s not ~vc]ved: <br /> <br /> BE IT FT~ER RESOLED th;'t th<~ C~ty Councf] o¢ th~ C4tv <br />of Pleasc~ton strongly urges the Alameda County Board o'r <br />Supervisors to place the possibility o¢ Alameda County's p~- <br />ticip~t~on in the finzncJn~ o{ the proposed Co]~sel~ Complex be- <br />fore the' voters at the June ]96~ elect~oo ~s eJ. tber ~ <br />obl~gst~oD or revenue bond measurm; <br /> <br /> BE IT FIRMER RESOLVED that copies of tb~s resolution he <br />~ent to the Al~ed~ CouDty Board o~ ~?erv~gor~. all <br />County cities, and any other interested psrtins. <br /> <br /> Dated: M~rch 26, ]962 <br /> <br />ATTE S T: <br /> <br />M~GARET t,. CONNER <br /> <br /> <br />