Laserfiche WebLink
Since all of these buildings vary in size, shape, and setbacks, staff did not find an established <br /> size or spacing of buildings to t.se and believes the project should be reviewed on it on merits. <br /> Staff believes that the proposed siting, massing, and size of the units are appropriate and would <br /> result in an attractive development. The smaller Plan 1 and 2 homes would be located along <br /> Stanley Boulevard and would be in keeping with the scale and massing of the smaller homes on <br /> Stanley Boulevard. The largest Plan 3 home has been sited on Lots 5, 6, and 8, which would <br /> minimize impacts on surrounding residential neighbors. Please see the "House Sizes and Floor <br /> Area Ratio" section below for further discussion on the house sizes and FARs. <br /> Demolition of the Existing Dwelling <br /> The existing single-family home built in 1908 would be demolished. The home is not included <br /> in the Historic Neighborhoods and Structures table of the General Plan nor was it included in the <br /> Downtown Historic Resource List and Map that was created for the 2002 update of the <br /> Downtown Specific Plan to identify individual properties and neighborhoods that contain <br /> outstanding examples of heritage structures. The project site is also not located in one of the <br /> four Heritage Neighborhoods that are identified in the Downtown Design Guidelines. <br /> Although the property is not specifically listed in the General Plan or Downtown Specific Plan <br /> as an historic resource, the General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan, and Downtown Design <br /> Guidelines contain policies regarding the City's preservation goals. The General Plan has a <br /> policy which states: Preserve and rehabilitate those cultural and historic resources which are <br /> significant to Pleasanton because of their age, appearance, or history. The Downtown Specific <br /> Plan has a policy that states: Require the completion of the State of California Department of <br /> Parks and Recreation (DPR) Survey Form-523 to develop and document a statement of historic <br /> significance prior to the issuance of demolition permits for any historic resource older than <br /> 50 years. Evaluate these properties using the State of California criteria for the California <br /> Register of Historic Resources. The Specific Plan also has the following policy: Prohibit the <br /> demolition of any building found to be historically significant with regard to the California <br /> Register criteria unless such building is determined by the Chief Building Official to be unsafe <br /> or dangerous, and if no other reasonable means of rehabilitation or relocation can be achieved. <br /> The Downtown Design Guidelines indicate that demolition of buildings over 50 years of age is <br /> generally discouraged and that remodeling is encouraged over replacement. <br /> Staff does not believe the existing residence is currently unsafe or dangerous, although it does <br /> show signs of disrepair. In order to determine the historic significance of the structure, the <br /> structure was analyzed and a DPR Survey Form-523 was prepared by Architectural Resources <br /> Group (ARG), a company that specializes in historic research, historic architecture, and historic <br /> preservation (Exhibit I). In order to be considered eligible for listing in the California Register, <br /> the structure must meet one or more of the following California Register criteria (the National <br /> Register criteria are similar to the State criteria): <br /> PUD-82 Page - 11 - September 15, 2010 <br />