11 ATTACHMENT 04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner O'Connor stated that while it would be good to have the house preserved that he will support the home's demolition; and that he considers it to be unfortunate that the City gives applicants the idea that following specific rules and procedures will result in an outcome, only to have the hearing body refute the outcome. Commissioner O'Connor stated his concern that the wording of the preservation standards, if strictly followed, will result in the removal of many of the older homes that he would like to see preserved. Commissioner Pentin stated that he will support the demolition of the house; that the Commission has not made a finding to preserve the home; and that the consultant has indicated that the home does not rank as a heritage house. Commissioner PentiI questioned what would be accomplished by surrounding the existing home wilh a higher density residential development. Chair Narum stated that she supports the demolition of the existing home. She noted that the integrity of this section of Stanley [Boulevard is already gone and that there is only one other house remaining on this street that is more than 50 years old. She added that the City should focus on the older residential neighborhoods having many large historic homes that may not meet preservation criteria. Applicant's Response The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home. • Density Comments Commissioners Blank, O'Connor, and Pentin wanted a further reduction in density from the 13 units of the revised development plan to 12 units. Chair Narum stated that she could support 13 units, if the applicant reduced the house sizes and floor area ratios and increased the building setbacks. Commissioner Pearce concurred wi:h a reduction in density but stated that she could support an increase in density for non-single-family homes with decreased living space and increased open space. Commissioner Blank added that a further decrease in density will provide an increase in open space, preserve additional trees, and, perhaps, reduce shading of the photovoltaic panels on the adjacent neighbor's property. Applicant's Response The applicant has nct reduced the density of the proposed development from the 13-unit plan that was reviewed and discussed by the Planning Commission at the work session. • House Sizes and Floor Area Ratios Comments Chair Narum stated that the proposed house sizes and floor area ratios are too high and suggested decreasing the house sizes in order to increase the rear yard setbacks and to provide additional open space. Commissioner Pearce wanted to Item 6.a., PUD-82 Page 5 of 22 July 13, 2011