Laserfiche WebLink
8. Exhibit H - Neighborhood Petition Submitted at the May 21, <br /> 2008, Planning Commission Work Session Meeting <br /> 9. Exhibit I - California Department of Parks and Recreation <br /> Survey Form-523 Prepared by Architectural Resources Group <br /> 10. Exhibit J - Letter from Linda Garbarino, Pleasanton Heritage <br /> Association <br /> 11. Exhibit K - Public Noticing Map <br /> I. BACKGROUND <br /> David DiDonato has submitted a PUD rezoning and development plan application for a 14-unit <br /> residential development in the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) Area. The City Council <br /> approved the Downtown Specific Plan in March 2002. The Specific Plan land use designation <br /> for the subject site is High Density Residential (please see Exhibit C, Downtown Specific Plan <br /> Land Use Map). In conjunction with the adoption of the DTSP, the General Plan Land Use <br /> Designations of several properties were changed to make them consistent with the Downtown <br /> Specific Plan Land Use Designations. The General Plan Land Use Designation for the subject <br /> site was changed from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. <br /> PUD rezoning and development plan applications are subject to review and approval by the City <br /> Council, following recommendation by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission's <br /> recommendation on the proposed PUD project will be forwarded to the City Council for review <br /> and final decision. If the rezoning and development plan are approved, the applicant must next <br /> apply for tentative map approval to allow the site to be subdivided in accordance with the <br /> development plan. Tentative map applications are subject to review and approval by the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> May 21, 2008, Planning Commission Work Session <br /> In order to receive early feedback from the Planning Commission and any interested individuals <br /> regarding the proposed project, a Planning Commission work session was held on May 21, <br /> 2008. The Planning Commission provided the following comments on the work session <br /> discussion points (additional comments made by the Commission are located in the attached <br /> minutes): <br /> 1. Is the proposed density acceptable? <br /> Some Commissioners stated that the proposed density was too high and believed that a few lots <br /> should be removed while other Commissioners believed the density was acceptable. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that a one- to two-unit reduction would be appropriate, but indicated <br /> if the floor area ratio (FAR) or layout were different, then it might be a different issue. <br /> PUD-82 Page - 2 - September 15, 2010 <br />