My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember McGovern referred to page 15 of the September 15, 2010 staff report, which states that a <br /> 29-foot high sound wall installed along the railroad line and around the sides of the development would be <br /> required to fully mitigate noise issues. Mr. Dolan said it is clearly an issue. Since it is unreasonable to <br /> provide this mitigation and develop the property as residential within the City's noise guidelines, this is an <br /> acknowledged and accepted limitation of the property. <br /> Councilmember McGovern stated that in addition to her issues with density, green space, and trees, she <br /> feels the existing bungalow should be restored and maintained as a heritage structure. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan asked if the noise study included a profile detailing the impacts on residents as <br /> they move further from the noise source. Mr. Otto said noise was analyzed throughout the project site and <br /> actual mitigations for the windows vary based on the homes' distance from the railroad tracks. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan requested specific data. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she met with two members of the PHA and viewed the site on her own <br /> as well as with the applicant. She said the tree survey map is incorrect and actually shows the property <br /> line with a huge setback between the fence and detached garage of the single family home next door. Mr. <br /> Otto agreed there is very little setback on the garage and referred her to the full sized plans. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio questioned whether this is to Code. Mr. Otto said it does not meet current <br /> setback requirements, but guessed it to be an old structure. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio confirmed with staff that the installed solar panels were permitted. She <br /> referred to page 6 of the staff report, noting that solar collectors must be set back at least 5 feet from a <br /> property line. Mr. Otto clarified that the Solar Shade Control Act guidelines stipulate only the conditions <br /> that a property must meet to be protected under the act, and not those that the site is generally subject to. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan said that regardless of the Solar Shade Control Act, this is a PUD and it is within <br /> the discretion of the Council to shift these houses around in a way that they do not interfere with the <br /> neighbor's solar panels. Councilmember Cook-Kallio acknowledged the point, but said it seemed a bit <br /> disingenuous to complain about the other person's setback. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio confirmed with staff that a tree's heritage designation has nothing to do with <br /> age or canopy. She struggled with the designation and condition of each tree as listed on the survey. She <br /> said she envisioned much different trees than what she saw at the site and that the latter did not meet <br /> with her perception of a heritage tree. In balancing the need for housing versus that for trees, she said <br /> she would be in favor of removing the trees along the rear of the property. She said the importance of <br /> preserving or restoring Pleasanton's heritage and history is something that will likely be a struggle in the <br /> coming years. She thought it somewhat unfair to the applicant to do so on an individual basis and said <br /> these conversations should have happened well before this point. While the existing bungalow is an old <br /> home, she is not convinced it needs to be preserved. <br /> The Mayor called for a brief break, and thereafter, reconvened the regular meeting and opened the publ,c <br /> hearing. <br /> David DiDonato, applicant, said he has been working on this project for the last three years under the <br /> guidance of staff and the City's documents. He said he has contracted three different noise studies in ar <br /> attempt to address noise issues, but the City's guidelines make it difficult. He said it is infeasible to <br /> construct a 29-foot sound wall, but every window along the units adjacent to the railroad line has a <br /> commercial hotel grade window with an STC rating of at least 45. He said this, in conjunction with the <br /> proposed sound wall, would result in bedrooms quieter than those in existing developments along this <br /> corridor. <br /> City Council Minutes, December 7, 2010 PUD-82, Donato Builders <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.