Laserfiche WebLink
which indicates that all three trees are healthy and unlikely to fall over, although each <br /> had some defects in structure. Tree #62 (the middle tree) has had several large branch <br /> failures over the years and has an asymmetric form; the arborist recommended removal <br /> of this tree. The City's Landscape Architect agreed with the arborist's findings and <br /> approved the removal of the tree. Exhibit N is the memo prepared by the City's <br /> Landscape Architect further explaining the analysis in the tree report and justification for <br /> approving the tree's removal. The property owner has not yet removed Tree #62. <br /> Tree Preservation/Mitiqation <br /> In the past, the Planning Commission and/or City Council have attempted to discourage <br /> tree loss in developments by adding an extra requirement to contribute the value of <br /> removed trees to the City's Urban Forestry Fund. The Urban Forestry Fund is used to <br /> plant new trees in the City as well as conservation, promotion, and public education in <br /> regard to Pleasanton's street trees, park trees, and trees on private property. The <br /> arborist has valued the eight trees to be removed at $56,850, which excludes the value <br /> of the mulberry tree along Stanley Boulevard that will be removed by the City for the <br /> Stanley Boulevard reconstruction project. <br /> Staff normally tries to mitigate tree removal by requiring additional trees be planted on <br /> the site beyond what is normally required in production home developments (i.e., street <br /> trees and other trees installed in the front yards). In some developments, tree mitigation <br /> is required at a 6:1 ratio for each tree removed with a certain percentage of those trees <br /> being box-sized. Given the small size of the lots, staff does not believe there is <br /> adequate room to install additional trees, particularly if a 6:1 ratio is used for the 18 <br /> trees to be removed. Therefore, at the prior hearings, staff had recommended that the <br /> applicant pay the appraised value of the trees to be removed into the City's Urban <br /> Forestry Fund. Staff recommends that the value of Tree #62 ($16,000) should not be <br /> included since the City's Landscape Architect already approved the removal of this tree,. <br /> The value of the trees to be removed is $40,850 if Tree #62 is excluded. <br /> The applicant has indicated that he may install landscaping for all yard areas around the <br /> homes. Should the applicant decide to install landscaping for all yard areas, staff would <br /> recommend the applicant receive credit for the cost of the trees installed in the rear and <br /> side yard areas beyond that currently shown on the development plan. <br /> Open Space Landscaping <br /> The preliminary landscape plan proposes one flowering accent tree and six small <br /> accent trees on the east side of the open space area by the detached garage with Mr. <br /> Walterson's photovoltaic panels. The plant palette specifies 10 types of trees and 21 <br /> types of shrubs for the entire development, but does not designate the types of trees <br /> and shrubs for the common area. The landscape plan does state that the tree height for <br /> the flowering accent tree on the southeast corner of the open space area should, <br /> "...remain clear of neighboring solar sunlight" shown on the east side of the common <br /> open space area. Staff has included a condition that the tree and shrub species <br /> selected for the open space area shall not block Mr. Walterson's photovoltaic panels. <br /> Item 6.a., PUD-82 Page 20 of 22 July 13, 2011 <br />