My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DSP streets and intersections were built prior to modern road standards and lack the <br /> necessary right-of-way for major roadway improvements. Furthermore, removing on- <br /> street parking, adding additional travel lanes, and reducing sidewalk width — the types of <br /> traffic improvements that are typically required — would be inconsistent with the desired <br /> pedestrian character for the Downtown. <br /> • The 13 unit proposal will generate approximately 10 a.m. and 13 p.m. peak hour <br /> trips and 130 daily trips compared to the 11 a.m. and 14 p.m. peak hour trips and <br /> 140 daily trips of the previous proposal. The proposed project is considered a <br /> small-scale project located in the Downtown, and, for these reasons, does not <br /> require a traffic study. In addition, the Final EIR that was approved for the <br /> Downtown Specific Plan anticipated development of this site with high density <br /> residential uses. Impacts and mitigations were addressed in this EIR. The <br /> residential use and proposed site layout are not anticipated to create any unique <br /> traffic or circulation circumstances. The applicant would be required to pay the <br /> City and Tri-Valley traffic fees as part of the project. <br /> • The applicant will pay the proposed development's pro-rata share of the City's <br /> planned Stanley Boulevard reconstruction to modify and improve Stanley <br /> Boulevard described in the attached Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit G) <br /> that will improve vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation on this section of <br /> Stanley Boulevard between Main Street and Stanley Boulevard. <br /> • Vehicular access to the development will only be provided from the single private <br /> street off Stanley Boulevard, which is preferred from a traffic safety and flow <br /> standpoint. <br /> Therefore, the reduced density project combined with the Stanley Boulevard <br /> reconstruction will result in a proposed development that will be consistent with the <br /> City's traffic safety and accessibility standards. <br /> Parking <br /> As part of the Stanley Boulevard reconstruction project, a paved parallel parking lane <br /> will be provided on the north side of the street with no parking allowed on the south side <br /> of Stanley Boulevard. Two garage parking spaces will be provided per unit. The <br /> proposed parking ratio for the revised development plan with 13 units, a total of 26 <br /> garage parking spaces, and 7 open guest parking spaces will equal 2.54 parking <br /> spaces per unit. The residential driveways will be at least 18-feet long and able to <br /> accommodate parked vehicles with the garage door in a closed position. Adding each <br /> unit's driveway apron parking will increase the assigned and guest parking to a total of <br /> 59 parking spaces or 4.54 parking spaces per unit with each unit having four assigned <br /> parking spaces in the unit's garage and driveway apron. <br /> As conditioned, the garages will not be allowed to be modified by the residents or used <br /> for storage in a manner that interferes with the ability to park two cars within the garage; <br /> that the residents shall park their vehicles in the garages; and that the driveways shall <br /> remain free of boats, trailers, campers, etc., to provide additional parking for guests and <br /> any additional vehicles owned by the residents. A condition of approval requires that <br /> Item 6.a., PUD-82 Page 16 of 22 July 13, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.