My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 2:41:01 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:41:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Narum proposed a modification to the condition on the playground equipment that <br /> it be installed in conjunction with the Landscape Architect's determination of what play <br /> structure would be appropriate for the limited space. <br /> Commissioner Blank proposed the language "The type of play structure shall be subject <br /> to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development." <br /> Commissioners Pentin inquired if the stipulation included that the builder would have the <br /> vote of the HOA after the 1 lb lot is sold and that the tot lot will be paid for by the <br /> developer. <br /> Chair Narum said yes. <br /> Commissioners Blank and Pentin accepted the amendment. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor indicated that he is in agreement with Commissioner Blank's <br /> statement. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that her position on this property is well-known and that <br /> she is gratified that the City Council returned this to the Commission for further work. <br /> She indicated that she thinks this is a better project than it was when it was originally <br /> forwarded to the City Council, which has always been her hope. She added that she <br /> believes the applicant has satisfied the Council's direction in what has been done with <br /> the project and that, therefore, she will support the motion. <br /> Commissioner Pearce continued that she is disappointed that the house could not be <br /> saved; however, she believes that under the current City guidelines regarding <br /> preservation, these guidelines have been satisfied. She noted that an expert was asked <br /> to come in to determine whether or not this was a historical resource; the expert did that <br /> and determined that it was not. She reiterated that this underscores the importance of <br /> having historic preservation discussions, so that the City can determine what is <br /> important to the City and not be reliant on the State and Federal guidelines. She <br /> indicated that she is gratified that two additional trees have been saved but is <br /> disappointed that more could not be saved, although she understands the financial and <br /> other constraints of the project. She emphasized that she believes this is a very <br /> appropriate site for affordable-by-design homes that are within walking distance to the <br /> Downtown. <br /> Chair Narum agreed with Commissioner Pearce's comments and stated that she thinks <br /> this is not where the battle to saving houses is, that it is more to the south. She <br /> indicated that she wished more trees could be saved and that she supports the motion. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2011 Page 9 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.