My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 11:42:50 AM
Creation date
8/26/2011 11:42:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
common open space area upon demand by the Community Development Director after <br /> the 11th house is sold, if decided by the Homeowners Association; 2) the City shall <br /> review with the tentative map access to the detached garage and photovoltaic panels <br /> located on the Walterson property; and, 3) the timing of payment of the in-lieu park <br /> dedication fee and the pro-rata share to reconstruct Stanley Boulevard shall be <br /> approved by the Community Development Director. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The subject infill development has been designed in conformity with the General Plan <br /> and Downtown Specific Plan. The architectural style of the homes is appropriate for <br /> Downtown and the homes will be an attractive addition to the Stanley Boulevard area. <br /> A detailed analysis and discussion of the proposal is included in the attached Planning <br /> Commission staff reports dated July 13, 2011, and September 15, 2010, including: <br /> General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan conformity, zoning and uses, site design, <br /> demolition of the existing dwelling, traffic and circulation, parking, noise and vibration, <br /> grading, drainage, utilities, building design, house sizes and FAR, site development <br /> standards, Green Building, common and private open space, landscaping and fencing, <br /> tree removal and mitigation, and Growth Management. <br /> Noise and Vibration <br /> Train Horns <br /> Councilmember Sullivan requested that an addendum to the noise analysis for train <br /> horns be completed for the interior spaces of each of the proposed homes. The <br /> addendum is part of Attachment #4. It analyzed the noise levels for Lot 1, Lot 6, Lot 7, <br /> and Lot 8. <br /> As shown on "Table 1: Train Horn Interior Maximum Noise Levels, dBA" of the noise <br /> addendum, the operation of train horns will generate from 89 dBA to 112 dBA at a 75- <br /> foot distance from the train that STC 46 rated doors/windows will reduce interior noise <br /> levels by 41 dB for Lot 6, Lot 7, and Lot 8, the lots adjoining the railroad right-of-way; <br /> and that STC 28 rated doors/windows will reduce the interior noise levels by 20 dB for <br /> Lot 1 facing Stanley Boulevard. Table 2, below, copies a portion of the table in the <br /> noise addendum and shows the interior noise levels for train horns. <br /> Table 2: Interior Noise Levels Due to Train Horns/Whistles <br /> Lot Window STC Noise Interior Sound Level Interior Sound Level <br /> Rating Reduction (Master Bedroom) (Bedroom Two) <br /> 1 28 20 dBA 41 dBA to 64 dBA 52 dBA to 75 dBA <br /> 6 46 41 dBA 44 dBA to 67 dBA 51 dBA to 74 dBA <br /> 7 46 i 41 dBA 41 dBA to 64 dBA 45 dBA to 68 dBA <br /> 8 46 1 41 dBA 41 dBA to 64 dBA 51 dBA to 74 dBA <br /> The train horn sound levels of the Lot 1 Bedroom Two interior is louder than for Lot 6, <br /> Lot 7, and Lot 8 because the STC rating of the Lot 1 windows does not need to be as <br /> high in order to mitigate the train engine/wheel noise. Train horns are operated to warn <br /> motorists and pedestrians of an oncoming train and generate very loud noise levels <br /> lasting a short duration; for this reason, train horns cannot be effectively mitigated by <br /> Page 8 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.