My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
081611
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2011 11:31:41 AM
Creation date
8/9/2011 11:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2011. He said the main two components of the element are the goals, policies, and programs, <br /> as well as the list of housing sites. They have been prepared in compliance with State law and <br /> the settlement agreement. <br /> Mr. Dolan said staff is required to rezone 69 acres and list current sites at 105 acres. The task <br /> force thought that getting feedback from HCD prior to finalizing the list was a good idea, which <br /> was agreed upon. Staff plans to make it clear to HCD that it will not plan to rezone all 105 acres, <br /> but rather do something more specific with the requirement. <br /> Mr. Dolan said secondly, all California communities are required to adopt a Housing Element <br /> and provide a land inventory to accommodate future growth. The settlement agreement affects <br /> this document in some limited ways in that there is a schedule and that it created some <br /> requirements that the City expand on its current programs to facilitate affordable housing for <br /> families. The City committed to doing an EIR which it may or may not have done anyway and <br /> also agreed to complete the rezonings concurrently with adoption of the Housing Element. <br /> Planning Manager Janice Stern reviewed the schedule, noting that the City has a commitment <br /> to adopt the Housing Element and rezonings within 90 days of receiving comments from HCD. <br /> On June 1s`, the Housing Element Task Force voted on the list of sites and recommended draft <br /> goals, policies and programs as was presented in May. Ms. Stern presented a map showing the <br /> 17 sites and sites that include a large site with potentially a smaller area which would be <br /> converted to multi-family housing which is relative to Site 11; the Kiewitt site and Site 14; the <br /> Legacy Partners site. She said the graphic representation of the Auf de Maur/Richenback Site 8 <br /> represents 11.5 acres which was the Planning Commission's recommendation, with the <br /> Housing Task Force recommendation being at 5.3 acres. Those sites recommended by the <br /> Housing Task Force at 23 urits per acre were to meet moderate income housing need, and <br /> sites at 30 units per acre were to meet low and very low income housing need. <br /> In reviewing goals, policies arid programs Ms. Stern said most programs were carried forward <br /> from the 2003 Housing Element. Staff believes the Housing Element was successful in <br /> accomplishing housing needs but needed to make changes related SB2, new State <br /> requirements for emergency shelters, supportive, and transitional housing, which are <br /> accomplished in Goal 20. They also needed to make changes relative to the settlement <br /> agreement which are embodied in Policy 45 and which require the City to identify needs for <br /> special needs housing, consider the use of lower income housing fund monies to develop 3- <br /> bedroom units supportive to low and very low income large families, to consider City assistance <br /> to non-profit housing developers, hold an annual review of the Housing Element and discuss <br /> progress in meeting the housing needs, and work with East Pleasanton Property Owners to <br /> secure a site for family housing. <br /> Other recommended amendments include exploring ways to increase construction of second <br /> units as a way to meet affordable housing need, review the condominium conversion ordinance <br /> to better protect tenants and potentially require greater affordability, to review the growth <br /> management ordinance, complete rezonings and General Plan amendments necessary to <br /> accommodate the City's housing need, assess the level of effort to overcome any infrastructure <br /> constraints that could limit affordable housing, consider a high priority for use of the low income <br /> fund for for-profit and non-profit development partnerships, and require universal design <br /> features as feasible to meet the needs of persons with disabilities and to allow people to age in <br /> place. <br /> Ms. Stern noted specific Housing Commission action related to the goals, policies and programs <br /> which include amendments to the terms used for affordability. There was concern relating to <br /> second unit monitoring requirements; that the City only does monitoring as is feasible and only <br /> as there are funds to do so; that housing education through regional partnership should be <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 14 July 19, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.