My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
081611
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2011 11:31:41 AM
Creation date
8/9/2011 11:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was not in favor of it at all. She said to repeat the caveat that the City will not rezone more than <br /> it is supposed to by law is something that should be reflected as many times as possible when <br /> sending the plan onto HCD. She was somewhat inclined to agree with Nancy Allen about Site 7, <br /> and said this is a place under-utilized. She understands the neighborhood's concerns with traffic <br /> and schools but it is proximity to services and the freeway which makes it a prime site. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio seconded Councilmember Thorne's motion. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan thanked everybody involved in the process. Even though this is not a <br /> process that anybody wanted to do, because of State pre-emption and court pre-emption over <br /> local control and decision-making processes, they were forced into it. Despite this, the task <br /> force process and the process the City underwent with Hacienda are excellent examples of <br /> democracy in action and grassroots planning. The task force specifically laid out ranking criteria <br /> to look at the sites such that they be close to modes of public transportation, services and <br /> amenities, look at any impacts of existing and future residents, be compatible with existing <br /> neighborhoods, consistent with the General Plan, and others. It is important for the Council not <br /> to forget about that criteria in getting to the next step of refining the list and not overburdening <br /> one area of town or one neighborhood with too much high density zoning. Currently, the City is <br /> doing this, as the east side is overburdened and half of the City's need is being put on that <br /> corner. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan said he will support the motions made tonight, but he asked for an <br /> amendment that once feedback is received from HCD, the Council will go through the process <br /> of refining and revisiting sites with the goal of meeting the criteria and getting it closer to the true <br /> need. He said the East Side Specific Plan needs to be completed as part of this not only to <br /> ensure the City is planning for this but also that the City has some sort of funding plan, <br /> mechanism, and timeline in place so it knows how the infrastructure will get built. He has long <br /> advocated that the Auf de Maur/Richenback Site to be part of the East Side Specific Plan, but <br /> said no one has ever agreed with him on this. If not in the East Side Specific Plan it should be <br /> part of the funding plan because otherwise, the developers are getting a 'free ride' on <br /> infrastructure. He also thinks the Stoneridge Mall site is under-utilized, as it is right next to BART <br /> and retail, there is a sea of pavement, not too many neighbors, and it is an ideal site for high <br /> density housing. Similarly, regarding the need to create the City's growth management plan, <br /> also needed are design guidelines and development standards for high density housing. This <br /> would help both the property owners, developers and the community better understand what <br /> high density housing looks like. He also voiced support with policies which were refined through <br /> the task force process and changes suggested with the deferment of some of the suggestions to <br /> the other committees. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio stated that as the other member of the task force it is important to <br /> look at criteria in terms of how sites are chosen. Councilmember Sullivan pointed out that this <br /> criterion is located on pages 45 and 46 of the report. <br /> Councilmember Thorne agreed to make this part of the motion. Councilmember Cook-Kallio <br /> seconded the motion, as amended. <br /> Mayor Hosterman questioned if Councilmember McGovern was supportive of increased <br /> densities on Site 8 for the sake of going through the review process with HCD. Councilmember <br /> McGovern said she would be supportive, but made the point that she thinks a better product is <br /> offered to the community and neighborhoods when some feathering of development is done so <br /> that it is all not 4 stories and heavy mass. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan agreed and said both CM Capital and Auf de Maur changes are out in <br /> 'left field', and the task force wanted nothing to do with them. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 13 of 14 July 19, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.