My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051711
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
CCMIN051711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2011 3:15:05 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 3:15:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN051711
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Thorne asked how projections are prepared. Ms. Wagner stated that staff <br /> works with a consultant who projects based on state and local trends as well the mix of local <br /> retail businesses. Mr. Fialho noted that the projections are a reflection of both sales volume and <br /> inflation. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked how accurate the projections are, based on experience. Ms. <br /> Wagner said extremely accurate. <br /> Ms. Wagner discussed Hotel/Motel Tax projections, which foresee a 2% growth in each year. <br /> She also discussed Business License Tax projections, crediting the growth in large part to the <br /> City's aggressive staff in terms of collection. <br /> She reviewed General Fund expenditures, noting that revenues will set the budget in any <br /> balanced budget environment. While the projected $87.3 million in expenditures are monetarily <br /> similar to 2007/08, the expenditures themselves are materially different. Public safety <br /> represents 44% of the General Fund budget, followed by General Government, Community <br /> Development (8%), Community Services (4%), Library Services, Support Services, and Streets. <br /> Personnel represents 78% and non-personnel represents 22% of the General Fund <br /> expenditures, which is a decrease over 2009/10 levels and a reflection of staffs commitment to <br /> gradually decrease to 2003/4 levels. Salaries represent 60% of the overall budget, equaling <br /> $41.4 million. CaIPERS retirement costs represent 17% or $11.6 million, followed by benefits at <br /> $8.6 million, other post retirement benefits of $5 million, and workers' compensation. Staff <br /> projects that personnel costs will increase 1.9% in 2011/12 over 2010/11 and then 2.7% in <br /> 2012/23 for a cumulative increase of 4.6%. This relates to an anticipated increase in medical <br /> premiums. She noted that while there are no salary increases in the Two Year Budget, there are <br /> step increases per existing labor contracts. Retiring medical reserves are increased by $1 <br /> million in 2011/12, and $2 million in 2012/13. CaIPERS rates are projected to increase between <br /> 4.3-5.5% during the Two Year Budget, which offset by an employee pickup of the CaPPERS <br /> increase up to the employee contribution of 8%. <br /> Ms. Wagner reviewed non-personnel expenditure history, noting a fluctuation due to the City's <br /> previous funding of the repair and replacement program. While that is reduced, there exists over <br /> $15 million in repair and replacement reserves in the Internal Service Fund. Expenditures break <br /> down to Contract Services (32.6%), Utilities (16.4%), Replacement and Renovations, Field <br /> Supplies, Insurance, Vehicle Costs, Alameda County Services, and Budget Contingency. Non- <br /> personnel costs are projected to increase 1.5% for 2011/12 and 5.9% for 2012.13, for a <br /> cumulative increase of 7.4%. <br /> Mayor Hosterman asked if the City would be capable of performing the services provided by <br /> Alameda County in house. Ms. Wagner explained that this expenditure breaks down primarily <br /> into animal control and property tax collection fees, the latter of which cannot be performed in <br /> house. <br /> Ms. Wagner reviewed General Fund transfers, which comprise subsidies to the Para-Transit, <br /> Strom Drain, Cemetery, Golf Debt Service, and other Debt Service Funds. She noted that the <br /> Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Fund has not been subsidized since 2008/09. <br /> Mr. Fialho stated that the CIP would be presented to the Council on June 21st. The four-year <br /> planning document reflects infrastructure improvements in the areas of streets, acquisition of <br /> and improvements to new parks, miscellaneous facilities, water, and sewer improvements. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 10 May 17, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.