My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062211
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 062211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:26:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Blank inquired if those comments were considered regulatory. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern replied that they are obligatory if the City wishes to get its Housing Element <br />certified. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank stated that it was mentioned that the Draft would not necessarily <br />come back to the Commission if the HCD comments were minor, but would if the <br />changes were major. He inquired, assuming the Draft would come back to the <br />Commission, what the scope would be so the Commission can determine what it should <br />be thinking about, tonight as opposed to when it comes back, as it is not known if the <br />Commission would be able to make changes then. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that after the City receives the , the City will not have <br />officially adopted the Housing Element as part of the General Plan. He explained that <br />this would require a formal hearing process. He continued that in terms of <br />characterizing whether comments were considered regulatory, there will inevitably be <br />some discussion and negotiation if the City is not on the same page, and some <br />judgment on the part of the City as to how much of this should the City incorporate if the <br />City does not agree. He added that it is about whether or not the City feels it can get <br />certified and whether or not getting certified is a great enough value to do some things <br />that the HCD may suggest but that the City may not necessarily want to do. He noted <br />that the City will be in a much better position if its Housing Element is certified, and that <br />is goal; however, the City will still have a hearing process on a Draft that the <br />City can continue to amend up to the point where there is an official public hearing, just <br />like in any General Plan amendment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that assuming the Commission does not amend anything <br />tonight, it cannot really make any changes when the Draft returns from the HCD <br />because then the Housing Element might not be certified. He inquired if there is <br />anything the Commission should look at, any suggestions of areas the Commission <br />should make changes in tonight, or areas that are not very important because the HCD <br />will final those anyway. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that it is possible that the Commission may want to change something <br />later on that it has not commented on tonight, but that could put the City in a bind. He <br />noted that the HCD will focus in on a few areas and the City will have a big discussion <br />about those areas. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he needed some clarification regarding what staff <br />wanted the Commission to do with regard to Goal 5. He noted that staff had <br />recommended that the Commission make some edits such as including special needs <br />in the Goal, but staff also mentioned sending some of the suggestions to the Growth <br />Management Subcommittee and returning the letter to staff for further review and <br />action. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2011 Page 7 of 33 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.